It can also happen when they give them all the facts
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
Angela rayner tax dodger again...
- Thread starter motorbiking
- Start date
Do you really believe that AR understood the tax implications of her son's trust; an esoteric point of tax law, and then deliberately withheld that information from her tax adviser and conveyancer.
She is housing minister, has called out tax avoidance has called out second homes . So she should have sought out best advice possible then got it double checked before doing anything and who takes money from their disabled kid to buy a home mist people give their kids money
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,762
- Reaction score
- 5,331
- Country
It does raise the question about if she is capable of high office, given this isn’t the first time and she is such a fog horn on other people’s tax mistakes. You’d have thought she would have taken every possible step to get it right.
I wonder if her son got a good deal out of the deal
I wonder if her son got a good deal out of the deal
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2023
- Messages
- 539
- Reaction score
- 328
- Country
Like Rayner?
She's not great at English. I don't know about the facts.
I don't understand that point. How can you be guilty of tax evasion if you give your adviser all the facts and follow their advice.
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 4,504
- Reaction score
- 1,705
- Country
as a senior politician as well as "Housing Minister" I hope she not only understood the tax situation very well, she probably even new what "esoteric" meant
If she did not understand fully what she was doing then she should not be in the job
and if she did understand then she should not be in the job
We need politicians that do not fall so easily into gaping elephant traps
one way or another she is an idiot, and it is because of leaders like her that this country is in such an utter mess.
Or isn't it just more likely that she was given bad advice on a complex technical matter by a professional who was paid for his expertise.
Because they then fill everything in and you sign it to say it's correct. If what they have put despite you giving them all facts and figures has mistakes it is you they come after not them ...you then have to pay penalties to taxman ...and then it is down to you to go after accountant/advisor...taxman is not interested in them
Thanks, that's very clear. I hadn't thought of that angle.
The penalties are whatever they think you have under paid or believe it or not even paid the correct amount but in the wrong way they then fine you 100 quid a month and can go back years with that 100 quid a month if they find accountant has made the same mistake for years
You get a much better thrill bullying the weak?
