

Can all the taxpayers that paid for it go for a trip on it?what a stunner.

where did I say that?Why don't you want our money back ?
where did I say that?
I know from experience that its pointless to sue an entity that does not have the means to pay.
Medpro offered a settlement for £23M. they could have negotiated that up a bit.
Do you think the tax payer will get more than that after costs?

You admire the boat. Most would look at it and say it should be sold if money from medpro went to it.where did I say that?
They had the money. Can it be pursued further, let's see.I know from experience that its pointless to sue an entity that does not have the means to pay.
Peanuts in the scale of things.Medpro offered a settlement for £23M. they could have negotiated that up a bit

She doesn't own Lady M anymore. It's a beautiful boat, I'm sure her new owners think so too.You admire the boat. Most would look at it and say it should be sold if money from medpro went to it.
There was a value that Barrowman might have considered to avoid the reputational damage. That is worth nothing now.They had the money. Can it be pursued further, let's see.
but money that was offered and available.Peanuts in the scale of things.
but we wont. We will get about 1/2 a million. But at least the lawyers had fun.We should get a full refund, let's see what we get. I don't think this is over just yet. Do you ?

Did medpro pay for it, via income or anything?She doesn't own Lady M anymore. It's a beautiful boat, I'm sure her new owners think so too.
Good. But it's not the end yet.There was a value that Barrowman might have considered to avoid the reputational damage. That is worth nothing now.
Still peanutsbut money that was offered and available.
Time will tell. I think this will be pursued much much further yetbut we wont. We will get about 1/2 a million. But at least the lawyers had fun.
Nope. Even if we don't get any money back her reputation (and his) is in tatters.Even with the benefit of hindsight, they should have settled.

A separate action and available despite any settlement they may have made.First of all, I don't believe a word they say.
Can we get hold of the frozen £75 million.

You understand what the LIMITED bit means on PPE Medpro Limited?Did medpro pay for it, via income or anything?
The goal of litigation is to get money.Good. But it's not the end yet.
Reputation, gone. Money next
Still peanuts
Time will tell. I think this will be pursued much much further yet
Nope. Even if we don't get any money back her reputation (and his) is in tatters.
Exposed for what they are
A separate action and available despite any settlement they may have made.
Looking at the judgement, it's pretty damming on both sides.. but there does appear to be the matter of the fake certification. (have you read it yet?) I think that wont end up going anywhere near Mone or Barrowman.

YesYou understand what the LIMITED bit means on PPE Medpro Limited?
YesThe goal of litigation is to get money.
Not always.If you get more money settling than destroying. You should take the deal.

I know you like a bit of chatGPT, have a go at asking it to summarise https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content...e-for-Health-and-Social-Care-v-PPE-Medpro.pdf. it was pretty impressive. but the one pager had an error I think.No, I have little interest in these scum. What is the issue with the fake certificate, please?