Bluff and bluster fails.

[carmanmemoranda]

You understand what the LIMITED bit means on PPE Medpro Limited?

Yes

The goal of litigation is to get money.

Yes

If you get more money settling than destroying. You should take the deal.

Not always.

This isn't over yet. Give it time

 

[motorbiking]

No, I have little interest in these scum. What is the issue with the fake certificate, please?

I know you like a bit of chatGPT, have a go at asking it to summarise https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content...e-for-Health-and-Social-Care-v-PPE-Medpro.pdf. it was pretty impressive. but the one pager had an error I think.

Point 150 on - there is an allegation that the test certificate of conformity issues by Intertek was a fake.

Government lawyers also f** up. Storage costs were dismissed (308 on), despite being claimable under the contract. they failed to prove quantum.

there was also a comment from the judges that it was 40 government / 30 med pro and 30 unproven due to f** ups

 

[MNW67]

I know you like a bit of chatGPT, have a go at asking it to summarise https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content...e-for-Health-and-Social-Care-v-PPE-Medpro.pdf. it was pretty impressive. but the one pager had an error I think.

Point 150 on - there is an allegation that the test certificate of conformity issues by Intertek was a fake.

Government lawyers also f** up. Storage costs were dismissed (308 on), despite being claimable under the contract. they failed to prove quantum.

there was also a comment from the judges that it was 40 government / 30 med pro and 30 unproven due to f** ups

I have never used chatGPT !!

I am pretty handy with Google, though

 

[MNW67]

there was also a comment from the judges that it was 40 government / 30 med pro and 30 unproven due to f** ups

So, if it was more the government's fault than Medpro's, why did the government win the full amount.

 

[motorbiking]

Because they didn’t win the full amount, they screwed up on that. It boiled down to the terms of the framework. The full claim was some approx £133m

They had a right to reject based on the failure to meet the specification. Medpro argued they had accepted them, but that did not waive their framework right.

It was 40 in favour of claimant, 30 medpro and 30 missing evidence. But I need to find that again.

 

[motorbiking]

Not always.

I’m guessing you would sue someone out of principle? That’s pretty much the second rule of litigation. Principles are an expensive yet worthless commodity.

 

[noseall]

Biker chicken is trying very hard to divert attention from Mone and her hubby using her Tory buddies to jump to the front of the queue so they could loot hundreds of millions from the nation.

The very worst Tory scum. MBK heroes.

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Phoney Mone-y ... Phoney Mone-y (think about the Billy Idol song Mony Mony )

Selling tons of PPE at inflated prices that wasn't even fit for purpose.

Scummy scummy tactics.

Get her out of the House of Lords, strip the titles.

 

[motorbiking]

The very worst Tory scum. MBK heroes.

I don’t like her.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I’m guessing you would sue someone out of principle? That’s pretty much the second rule of litigation. Principles are an expensive yet worthless commodity.

Reputations are worth money

Hers isn't now

 

[MNW67]

It was 40 in favour of claimant, 30 medpro and 30 missing evidence. But I need to find that again.

I've had a quick look now. That seems to be about the evidence on the chain of custody and possible causes of contamination. It is a bit confusing. I think the judge is saying that 40% of the evidence points to the contamination being from the manufacture, 30% points to it being caused by the NHS storage process, and 30% of the evidence is missing.

 

[transam]

Don’t see what all the fuss is about tbh

Some one got caught with there hand in the
Till ?? So
Now have to pay it back ??

(Mean while post masters are still waiting for justice / payment)

 

[MNW67]

Don’t see what all the fuss is about tbh

Some one got caught with there hand in the
Till ?? So
Now have to pay it back ??

(Mean while post masters are still waiting for justice / payment)

And we've still got a hosepipe ban in Yorkshire

 

[blup]

Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.

 

[motorbiking]

Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.

I think it's more than likely.