Bluff and bluster fails.

motorbiking said:
I know you like a bit of chatGPT, have a go at asking it to summarise https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content...e-for-Health-and-Social-Care-v-PPE-Medpro.pdf. it was pretty impressive. but the one pager had an error I think.

Point 150 on - there is an allegation that the test certificate of conformity issues by Intertek was a fake.

Government lawyers also f** up. Storage costs were dismissed (308 on), despite being claimable under the contract. they failed to prove quantum.

there was also a comment from the judges that it was 40 government / 30 med pro and 30 unproven due to f** ups
Click to expand...

I have never used chatGPT !!

I am pretty handy with Google, though ;)
 
Because they didn’t win the full amount, they screwed up on that. It boiled down to the terms of the framework. The full claim was some approx £133m

They had a right to reject based on the failure to meet the specification. Medpro argued they had accepted them, but that did not waive their framework right.

It was 40 in favour of claimant, 30 medpro and 30 missing evidence. But I need to find that again.
 
JohnD said:
Biker chicken is trying very hard to divert attention from Mone and her hubby using her Tory buddies to jump to the front of the queue so they could loot hundreds of millions from the nation.
Click to expand...
The very worst Tory scum. MBK heroes.
 
Phoney Mone-y ... Phoney Mone-y (think about the Billy Idol song Mony Mony ;))

Selling tons of PPE at inflated prices that wasn't even fit for purpose.

Scummy scummy tactics.

Get her out of the House of Lords, strip the titles.
 
motorbiking said:
It was 40 in favour of claimant, 30 medpro and 30 missing evidence. But I need to find that again.
Click to expand...

I've had a quick look now. That seems to be about the evidence on the chain of custody and possible causes of contamination. It is a bit confusing. I think the judge is saying that 40% of the evidence points to the contamination being from the manufacture, 30% points to it being caused by the NHS storage process, and 30% of the evidence is missing.
 
Don’t see what all the fuss is about tbh

Some one got caught with there hand in the
Till ?? So
Now have to pay it back ??

(Mean while post masters are still waiting for justice / payment)
 
transam said:
Don’t see what all the fuss is about tbh

Some one got caught with there hand in the
Till ?? So
Now have to pay it back ??

(Mean while post masters are still waiting for justice / payment)
Click to expand...

And we've still got a hosepipe ban in Yorkshire :mad:
 
Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.
 
blup said:
Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.
Click to expand...
I think it's more than likely.
 
blup said:
Thread disruption aside, could it be the two plots of land were in separate ownership to reduce their value? One gave access to another but each was worth less individually than together. Like a pair of Chippendale chairs.
Click to expand...
motorbiking said:
I think it's more than likely.
Click to expand...

I can't get my head round that. Are we saying that Starmer and his parents might have worked together to con the landowner somehow into selling for a lower price. Is there a diagram of the plots. I'd like to see how it all fits together.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JohnD
A 46-year-old man.
2 3
Replies
38
Views
3K
diy_fun_uk
D
S
Trickle down Corruption? Hancock helped secure £180m PPE Deal
2 3
Replies
34
Views
4K
John the plumber
John the plumber
Back
Top