- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 27,200
- Reaction score
- 6,499
- Country

Based on the criteria that we don’t have to say what we think will happen. I think whatever you had in mind won’t happen.So you still couldn't answer.
Nice swerve
Try again

Based on the criteria that we don’t have to say what we think will happen. I think whatever you had in mind won’t happen.So you still couldn't answer.
Nice swerve
Try again

No she is still thereDidn’t she stand down?

Its a simple question, even for youBased on the criteria that we don’t have to say what we think will happen. I think whatever you had in mind won’t happen.

The end of what? I’ve asked you what you think will happen. You say that is irrelevant.Its a simple question, even for you
Do you think this is the end, or not!
Try an actual answer for once. I've made it as simple as possible for you

You’re right.No she is still there
The end of what? I’ve asked you what you think will happen. You say that is irrelevant.
Here are some options:
1 government will apply to lift the corporate veil and prove barrowman traded while knowingly insolvent
2 barrowman will be shown to have knowledge of the fraudulent certificates and be drawn in to the criminal proceedings and possibly suffer confiscation of proceeds from crime.
3 barrowmans, partners and suppliers will be chased.
Which of these do you think will happen, then we can discuss. I think 2 has the best chance.

I'm not after a discussion on what can or should happenThe end of what? I’ve asked you what you think will happen. You say that is irrelevant.
Here are some options:
1 government will apply to lift the corporate veil and prove barrowman traded while knowingly insolvent
2 barrowman will be shown to have knowledge of the fraudulent certificates and be drawn in to the criminal proceedings and possibly suffer confiscation of proceeds from crime.
3 barrowmans, partners and suppliers will be chased.
Which of these do you think will happen, then we can discuss. I think 2 has the best chance.

Assets have been frozen the criminal case is ongoing. It’s clearly not the end of if.I'm not after a discussion on what can or should happen
It was A VERY SIMPLE question that you still struggle with
Do you think this is the end of it ? Its yes, or no.
No need for anymore swerving or closed questions

Wow we got there. That must have hurt.Assets have been frozen the criminal case is ongoing. It’s clearly not the end of if.
Time will tell. I'm happy to give it time.Do I think the government will get their money. - no
The CE marks are just proof that the quality standards are met. The clearly weren't but the DHSC approved the order anyway. Some shadowy senior unnamed figure overruled the civil servants who were refusing to approve the supplier until the sterility standards were established. So government is involved as much as the supplier. Moaner and Barrrow boy were just looking for the contract to be signed, I doubt they were involved in the detail of the arrangements, but seem to be blamed by the public and press.I don't know much about the criminal case. What are the fraudulent certificates.
The CE marks are just proof that the quality standards are met. The clearly weren't but the DHSC approved the order anyway. Some shadowy senior unnamed figure overruled the civil servants who were refusing to approve the supplier until the sterility standards were established. So government is involved as much as the supplier. Moaner and Barrrow boy were just looking for the contract to be signed, I doubt they were involved in the detail of the arrangements, but seem to be blamed by the public and press.

Shameless hussey and a gold digger.. I wouldn't date herYou’re right.
![]()
Michelle Mone says she won't step down as Tory peer - and accuses chancellor of 'endangering' her
Baroness Mone has written to the prime minister accusing the chancellor of endangering her life with her comments, citing the murders of Jo Cox and David Amess as evidence of the risk facing parliamentarians.news.sky.com
No shame it seems.
I would guess the garments cost a few pence each to produce, and a lot of the cost is in the shipping, so who knows. The beeb reported there were other companies that were involved in the procurement, so maybe the arrangements are even more complicated than appears to be the case.I wonder how much profit MedPro made on the gowns. At one point in the judgment, there is correspondence where they claim the price will only cover their costs. I am not sure I believe them. The final contract price was £4.88 per gown.

see post 182 or 150 on in the judgement. There is dispute about representation, but its clear somebody faked the testing and an allegation of fraud is detailed in 153.I don't know much about the criminal case. What are the fraudulent certificates.

Most were queuing up to help at cost or less. My firm did a fair chunk for AZ FOC, and my CEO who is normally out for every penny, didn't want our teams to be charging commercial rates. I must admit it was refreshing to see firms who normally compete willing to work together.I would guess the garments cost a few pence each to produce, and a lot of the cost is in the shipping, so who knows. The beeb reported there were other companies that were involved in the procurement, so maybe the arrangements are even more complicated than appears to be the case.