Where have they gone?

Not correct

She said: Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it."


She used the words “set fire to all the f***** hotels full of the b****** That is a direct instruction.


She added the “for all I care” after the instruction. It's a subtle but very important distinction

This is misinformation for which you should be banned from the forum.

Lucy Connolly has no previous convictions. The ****stain who committed the crime of threatening to kill Farage, had committed crimes in other countries and was in the act of committing a crime (invading England) whe he made that threat. He was also a .muslim, a group known to have murdered politicians, and so thr threat was real.

Why do I bother.
 
probably because I am not too bothered about some of the flagship policies.

heard yo the first time. There is another answer.

The questionnaire is poor
I agree it is, but you chose it

It puts me exactly where I consider myself to be
 
This is misinformation for which you should be banned from the forum.

Lucy Connolly has no previous convictions. The ****stain who committed the crime of threatening to kill Farage, had committed crimes in other countries and was in the act of committing a crime (invading England) whe he made that threat. He was also a .muslim, a group known to have murdered politicians, and so thr threat was real.

Why do I bother.
Because you're a troll
 
what else did she say
Look it up, it was on the judges summary. I thought you'd read it, and understood it
Unfortunately, she took bad legal advice from an unknown Duty Sol and confessed under caution. Her options were limited.
Was it a duty sol? Are you sure ?
12 month suspension - particularly when you look at what Punchy Mike Aimesbury got, for actually beating someone to the ground in an unprovoked physical attack.
Not as much as the person that said hurty words to farage then?

Seems sort of sensible to me
 
Hurty words…just an opinion.
Pretty serious hurry words though all the same. Couple that up with a known lunatic with a tattoo of an AK 47 on his face and you have to consider the threat.
 
Can you ever have a sensible discussion? You always have to play the feckwit

LibDems
It's what your quiz firmly put you as.
like silly traffic calming schemes that serve no purpose other than frustrate people. They can't win anyway, so it's a waste of time to vote for them.
Depends if you are voting for an MP, or a party
labour seem to think that wealthy people got their money exploiting the poor. They seem happy to grow the state without considering the impact on jobs
You supported labour policy heavily on your quiz.
I want a country that can compete on the global scale. I'd like some wealthy high tax payers to be attracted to residing in the UK, so they can pay in to the UK.
I want those that earn big money here to pay big money here
I don't particularly get upset that 43% of my income goes in tax, I don't have much time for people who pay <10% suggesting I should pay more.
And we need more tax, so. Who ?
 
Pretty serious hurry words though all the same. Couple that up with a known lunatic with a tattoo of an AK 47 on his face and you have to consider the threat.
And he got locked up.

Rightly so.

It's the bias that's the issue, not his punishment
 
Back
Top