No plans to remove Andrew from line of succession after losing royal titles, government says
Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne and it would take an act of Parliament to formally remove him.
www.bbc.co.uk
Mr. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
www.bbc.co.uk
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,353
- Reaction score
- 7,846
- Country
And the house with 30 bedrooms? Suppose he gets to keep that then. I would sooner see him booted out of that and made to go flat hunting.
No, he's to vacate that, Sarah also. Apparently he's moving into a property on the Sandringham Estate.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,353
- Reaction score
- 7,846
- Country
One with only 20 bedrooms?
'We'll play again more soon.'
Dirty
Disgusting
Scummy
Dirty
Disgusting
Scummy
Isn't it interesting that only something like 1% of them have been released to date and they're holding up the voting in of the 218th signatory or whatever it is.
I suspect what will happen is the files will mysteriously disappear in some shape or form, or once more of them are released, the necessary redactions will have taken place to protect the 'great' and the 'good'.
Regardless of having enough signatories or not, just release all the remaining files now.
The powerful protecting the powerful, that's all this is.
Did you see the response from the audience when they broke off during recording to announce that Andrew had been stripped of his titles? They gave a rather large round of applause! I think his brother has done the right thing and I’m only glad that his mum and dad are not around to witness it.
Why?
Did the queen not partly contribute to paying off Virginia, or she contributed to a linked charity or something.
The royals, centuries of cover ups and nothing to see here. The issue they have is modern media and tech makes said cover ups less easy to achieve nowadays.
So that they didn’t see what a monster they’d given birth to. So that they didn’t witness the suicide of a woman that he had abused. So that they didn’t witness the type of people he considered his friends. So that they didn’t see the shame he'd brought on the Royal family. That's why. Would you want to be alive to witness those actions caused by someone you'd brought into the world?
Question Time audience reacts as Andrew stripped of 'prince' title
A recording of the programme was interrupted on Thursday as the news broke.
www.bbc.co.uk
So where is your sympathy for the victims in all this?
And since she paid off the victim who committed suicide, why shouldn't his mum share the shame?
Would you be so sympathetic if it was an immigrant family we are talking about?
Oops, it is an immigrant family!
Edit: Since we fund the royals, we in effect paid off his victim!
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 18,015
- Reaction score
- 1,511
- Country
It naturally follows that she knew something of his affairs.
Or did he just say send that woman some money mum, I've no idea why though
Quite, what exactly? I'm not siding with Andrew, but it's all allegations and we're supposed to be innocent till proven guilty. It had gone quiet until Virginia Guiffre's book came out, but why is it assumed that that is the gospel truth?
The king has said he has sympathy for all victims of abuse, but that would be more convincing if he didn't cosy up to muslims.
