

Shut up ya tart"..it was only the women that were affected, who cares..."
There are blokes on this forum that despise women and/or blokes that are frightened of them and then there are those that have a great respect for them. You can see the clear divide in this thread.
It wasnt people using the term "fireman", it was about workplace bullying.No, have you read it? he wasn't the one doing the bullying he didnt stop people who were saying fireman, a hard task probably.

Like I said a demotion was all that was needed, he didnt need to lose his job.It wasnt people using the term "fireman", it was about workplace bullying.
Unfortunately Pete, you have read a story in the Daily Mail which falsely implied somebody got sacked because people where he worked used the term freman.............but thats not the truth, is it?
"It found she had been subjected to “persistent” derogatory and offensive comments from two managers at the service, and she told the tribunal that the workplace culture at the service was openly misogynistic and discriminatory."
![]()
Hero fireman who allowed firefighters to say ‘fireman’ loses unfair dismissal case | LBC
A hero firefighter who was disciplined for not admonishing colleagues for using the term ‘fireman’ has lost his unfair dismissal case.www.lbc.co.uk
Bailey had not intervened when colleagues made sexist jokes, an internal investigation found, and he failed to handle an informal mediation between Acheson and a colleague that escalated into a more heated exchange.
Judge Woodhead found that Bailey had failed in his duties in a situation that showed signs of intimidation and a potential physical altercation
full text of tribunal
You mean the warning letters and the disciplinary BEFORE the tribunal?The bosses acted reasonably for him not taking action lol, why didn't they take action then (and stop people saying fireman)..
Helped indeed. He should have thrown in the management towel then, but I guess he didn’t like the idea of a pay cut. Who knows....help the guy out not hang him out to dry.

Yeah maybe he should have stepped down or even be made toYou mean the warning letters and the disciplinary BEFORE the tribunal?
Helped indeed. He should have thrown in the management towel then, but I guess he didn’t like the idea of a pay cut. Who knows.
he didnt lose his jobLike I said a demotion was all that was needed, he didnt need to lose his job.

Is he still doing the job?he didnt lose his job
no, at that point I hadnt bothered looking at what actually happenedPost 34 you thought differently, a bit of nonsense from your mates you changed.......turncoat

If nosall told you snooker tables were red you'd believe itno, at that point I hadnt bothered looking at what actually happened
I am sorry if you think facts are " a bit of nonsense"
he went off sick and resignedIs he still doing the job?

Jump before pushed yes I knowhe went off sick and resigned
he wasnt sacked