Reform Policies

[warey4life]

There are several graphical indicators on here which suggest pretty much the opposite thing. Most of the coloured lines I think are quite predictable, especially Labour and I think that this is probably down to one specific man, who I need not name. He has certainly brought in many changes which, I think, are not to anyone's interest and I suspect that this is primarily down to his not having any real idea what to actually do. A defence lawyer who seems to have one specific motivation: to object to anything remotely right wing.
The interesting change in my mind, though, is the Greenies. Why have they suddenly risen from a small not-particularly political organisation? My suspicion is that many of our young people are not politically motivated (nor knowledgeable) but somehow feel the need to pipe up against the more established parties.
The three so-called main parties are now struggling along at low double-figures, which suggests that most people are now losing interest in them, even Labour who, of course, has been the real consequence of its own downfall.
That suggests to me that not only have an increasing number of thinking voters realised that Reform is now our only real hope for the future and the possible restoration of what was once a proud and strong country.
Just my own opinion, of course, but time will tell. That, of course, depends upon whether they, or indeed anyone, can hope to restore the immense damage that has already been done to our country over not much more than a year of Labour.

What an absolute load of tripe

 

[JBR]

What an absolute load of tripe

A very considered comment! Perhaps you can show how each specific comment of mine is 'tripe', providing clear proof of your opinion.
It is very easy to call names, but providing evidence of your assertions is rather more difficult, I think. Go on, try to give a clear reaponse to each of my specific claims.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I'd suggest a general collapse of all of them, apart from the trendy Green vote. Trying to lump Reform with the Tories is a false premise, because the latter have also fallen heavily. I should add that lumping the Tories in as the 'Right' is incorrect; they have become more like the Limp Dems.

There's your first incorrect statement

I would like to add that I have only just discovered this political discussion forum and am very pleased to find that it is far more lively than the one I have been using for quite a long time which, sadly, has become rather boring, probably because the members have simply been repeating what they have all said before. Naturally I shall not name the place.

I personally like differing viewpoints, but just repeating well worn stuff like Tories are lib dems is just the same as all the others that can't actually point out why reform would be better

 

[MNW67]

A very considered comment! Perhaps you can show how each specific comment of mine is 'tripe', providing clear proof of your opinion.
It is very easy to call names, but providing evidence of your assertions is rather more difficult, I think. Go on, try to give a clear reaponse to each of my specific claims.

You said earlier that you are new to politics on this forum. But a quick search shows lots of previous political posts. Is this a festive reboot.

 

[JBR]

There's your first incorrect statement

I personally like differing viewpoints, but just repeating well worn stuff like Tories are lib dems is just the same as all the others that can't actually point out why reform would be better

I think if you have read all of my posts here, you might understand why.

 

[JBR]

You said earlier that you are new to politics on this forum. But a quick search shows lots of previous political posts. Is this a festive reboot.

Yes, I am new to this forum, but I have been debating politics for a long time, elsewhere.

 

[MNW67]

Yes, I am new to this forum, but I have been debating politics for a long time, elsewhere.

No, you have hundreds of political posts on this forum. Albeit, from a long time ago. Too much festive cheer?

 

[JBR]

No, you have hundreds of political posts on this forum. Albeit, from a long time ago.

Well, I'll take your advice to heart. To be quite honest, I have not visited this politics forum on DIYNot for a very long time, to the extent that I have forgotten my past interest. I have visited DIYNot regularly for other topics (like DIY) and was completely unaware of my previous interest in politics here. Hundreds? Wow! No, I'm afraid I have completely forgotten them. I wonder what my leanings were then.

 

[MNW67]

Well, I'll take your advice to heart. To be quite honest, I have not visited this politics forum on DIYNot for a very long time, to the extent that I have forgotten my past interest. I have visited DIYNot regularly for other topics (like DIY) and was completely unaware of my previous interest in politics here. Hundreds? Wow! No, I'm afraid I have completely forgotten them. I wonder what my leanings were then.

Quite right wing, by the looks of it. Before my time, so I don't actually know you.

 

[SPLINE]

Yes, I am new to this forum, but I have been debating politics for a long time, elsewhere.

Advice for you JBR : Never, ever answer any of their questions.

(They will never answer any of yours).

 

[JBR]

Advice for you JBR : Never, ever answer any of their questions.

(They will never answer any of yours).

Oh, I know what to say and what not to say. I used to be a spook in an early life.

 

[warey4life]

A very considered comment! Perhaps you can show how each specific comment of mine is 'tripe', providing clear proof of your opinion.
It is very easy to call names, but providing evidence of your assertions is rather more difficult, I think. Go on, try to give a clear reaponse to each of my specific claims.

Where have I called you a name?

I read your post and I thought to my self "what an absolute load of tripe". It was all ramblings from someone in his own alternative reality.