New build layout, is this typical?

Joined
16 Sep 2006
Messages
7,558
Reaction score
2,261
Location
Fife
Country
United Kingdom
I'm bored so perusing some of the new builds online around my area.

4 bed detached house, ground floor layout as below:

layout.jpg



If I'm looking at this correctly, the WC is essentially in the kitchen/diner, albeit with its door in a sort of recessed area.

Is this fairly typical? I wouldn't have thought it's ideal having a WC in the same space as where you cook and eat. I appreciate the designers have to fit x rooms into the given overall footprint, but nevertheless, not great.
 
The old two door rule went as it was realised it didn’t serve a hygiene purpose. Not that long ago, an old boy neighbour insisted on the en suite in his extension having a separate wc. Old habits die hard. It all went to pot when the toilets were brought inside.
 
What always gets me is that for example a 4 bed detached and yet fitted with a poxy little single oven and 4 little rings. Its like a toy. Maybe ok in a 2 bed semi but not 4 or 5 bed detached.
 
The three storey houses are a joke. 4 double bedrooms, two per floor upstairs so enough for a decent sized household, but the downstairs is also the size of two double bedrooms.

Most newbuilds feel like caravans to me.

Anything from 1950-1990 will be much better. You get the cavity walls, DPC and proper solid plaster rather than dry-lined plasterboard. Most importantly of all, the rooms should be big enough for actual human beings.
 
Buy a 1970’s house
They built some crap in the 1970s. Especially those things where they only have end walls just enough brickwork to hold the roof up and hopefully slow a fire down, the front and back are a timber frame with plasterboard on the inside and tiles nailed onto the outside.

They don't seem to be worth any less than a properly built house with bricks all round, so you should just avoid. If they were half-price for half a house then they'd be OK, but they never are.
 
It was probably OK even into the mid 90s. I think it was Prescott who started cramming more and more houses on the same size plot.
 
They built some crap in the 1970s. Especially those things where they only have end walls just enough brickwork to hold the roof up and hopefully slow a fire down, the front and back are a timber frame with plasterboard on the inside and tiles nailed onto the outside.

They don't seem to be worth any less than a properly built house with bricks all round, so you should just avoid. If they were half-price for half a house then they'd be OK, but they never are.

But a lot are well built and have drive ways and decent sized gardens. Often with potential to extend too
 
My place (bungalow) was built mid 80s, it's fine but is only stud partition internal walls so you tend to hear things no matter where you are in the property.
 
Back
Top