ICE told to get the eff out

You haven't watched the video I posted above then?

I've watched the relevant bit now. From what he says, it comes down to whether getting clipped by the bumper of a car going at 2mph can either

kill you; or cause

a physical injury that involves a substantial risk of death, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or a protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

And that only applies to the first gunshot. Hopefully, you will agree that the second two shots were illegal, because by that time he was in no danger.
 
I've watched the relevant bit now. From what he says, it comes down to whether getting clipped by the bumper of a car going at 2mph can either

kill you; or cause

a physical injury that involves a substantial risk of death, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or a protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

And that only applies to the first gunshot. Hopefully, you will agree that the second two shots were illegal, because by that time he was in no danger.
I think you will find that I am correct and that this shooting was justified. I am not making light of the fact that this poor woman was shot dead, that is a terrible tragedy but her own actions have caused her death. There was no telling her to move her car as has been mentioned on here, that is a lie. She was told to get out of her car and the ICE agents identified themselves to her. She chose to do this.
 
I think you will find that I am correct and that this shooting was justified. I am not making light of the fact that this poor woman was shot dead, that is a terrible tragedy but her own actions has caused her death. There was no telling her to move her car as been mentioned on here, that is a lie. She was told to get out of her car and the ICE agents identified themselves to her. She chose to do this.

But let's break it down and see what we can agree on.

What about the second two shots through the side window. By that time the agent was in no danger because the car was driving away from him. Do you agree that those two shots were illegal.
 
But let's break it down and see what we can agree on.

What about the second two shots through the side window. By that time the agent was in no danger because the car was driving away from him. Do you agree that those two shots were illegal.
No because the timing was correct, if the shots were fired further up the road then yes I would agree. It was 3 consecutive shots.
 
No because the timing was correct, if the shots were fired further up the road then yes I would agree. It was 3 consecutive shots.

Objection!!

Can the expert witness please clarify what he means by the phrase 'the timing was correct'. Is it not obvious that a car travelling away from you cannot be a danger to you.
 
or cause

a physical injury that involves a substantial risk of death, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or a protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.
A gun fired at point blank range, by a masked gunman will do that yes.

I beleive he called her an effing be-atch after he murdered her.
 
Back
Top