I watched it, multiple gunshots and murder was not justified.You haven't watched the video I posted above then?
I watched it, multiple gunshots and murder was not justified.You haven't watched the video I posted above then?
You haven't watched the video I posted above then?

I think you will find that I am correct and that this shooting was justified. I am not making light of the fact that this poor woman was shot dead, that is a terrible tragedy but her own actions have caused her death. There was no telling her to move her car as has been mentioned on here, that is a lie. She was told to get out of her car and the ICE agents identified themselves to her. She chose to do this.I've watched the relevant bit now. From what he says, it comes down to whether getting clipped by the bumper of a car going at 2mph can either
kill you; or cause
a physical injury that involves a substantial risk of death, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or a protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.
And that only applies to the first gunshot. Hopefully, you will agree that the second two shots were illegal, because by that time he was in no danger.
I think you will find that I am correct and that this shooting was justified. I am not making light of the fact that this poor woman was shot dead, that is a terrible tragedy but her own actions has caused her death. There was no telling her to move her car as been mentioned on here, that is a lie. She was told to get out of her car and the ICE agents identified themselves to her. She chose to do this.

No because the timing was correct, if the shots were fired further up the road then yes I would agree. It was 3 consecutive shots.But let's break it down and see what we can agree on.
What about the second two shots through the side window. By that time the agent was in no danger because the car was driving away from him. Do you agree that those two shots were illegal.

Why? He can't see any other view.But let's break it down and see what we can agree on.
Youre trying to talk logicWhat about the second two shots through the side window. By that time the agent was in no danger because the car was driving away from him. Do you agree that those two shots were illegal.
No because the timing was correct, if the shots were fired further up the road then yes I would agree. It was 3 consecutive shots.
Phew! That's a reliefThis article shows the woman's "wife" sitting on the pavement with a dog, which looks like the dog from the car. Hope it is ok.
![]()
New video shot by ICE agent who killed Renee Good shows what happened
Newly released video shows the moment Renee Nicole Good taunted the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who shot her dead.www.dailymail.co.uk
A gun fired at point blank range, by a masked gunman will do that yes.or cause
a physical injury that involves a substantial risk of death, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or a protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

And still the reform types are trying to justify it.A gun fired at point blank range, by a masked gunman will do that yes.
I beleive he called her an effing be-atch after he murdered her.

Innocent until proven guilty do you mean?Namely the loony Tim Walz and the other fruit cake Jacob Frey. They do not even understand their own laws.
Poor you, they won't miss you

LIESA gun fired at point blank range, by a masked gunman will do that yes.
I beleive he called her an effing be-atch after he murdered her.
I have already watched the incident and confidently tell you anyone who says the agent was in danger of being run over has his head so far up his dusty a*s they haven't a scooby what they're looking at.You haven't watched the video I posted above then?
Amazing, a pro gun organisation supports the use of lethal force narrative. I'm shocked.You haven't watched the video I posted above then?