Bus driver sacked OMG

[motorbiking]

Would love to see you defending that in court...

Cue another load of failed defence arguments

which bit didn't you understand?

 

[Mottie]

You forget the bit about afterwards screaming down a public street

There was no sound on the video. Where did you get the screaming from?

 

[pete01]

There was no sound on the video. Where did you get the screaming from?

He probably woke up in night screaming, worrying about that poor bloke you smacked

 

[ellal]

There was no sound on the video. Where did you get the screaming from?

One look at the face is enough...

Mind you, at least you admit running down a street brandishing a weapon which is against the law...

Imagine if you had been carrying a table leg

 

[ellal]

which bit didn't you understand?

Your bovine excrement as usual

 

[motorbiking]

running down a street brandishing a weapon which is against the law...

nonsense

Your bovine excrement as usual

more nonsense

 

[morqthana]

I couldn't be bothered to read it all,.

Then you may not comment on it.

 

[Dec27]

Then you may not comment on it.

Is that a fact or an opinion?

 

[noseall]

nonsense

more nonsense

Nope...

Force Must Cease When the Threat Does: You must stop using force once the danger has passed. Continuing to attack a person who is no longer a threat (e.g., someone running away or incapacitated) could result in your own prosecution

 

[noseall]

Is that a fact or an opinion?

It's probably a sensible observation. MBK likes to throw long winded links at folks, and then gets upset when other posters actually read them and he doesn't. Same sort of blithe ignorance.

 

[morqthana]

some would say he was a violent vigilante, a dangerous criminal. But they'd be daft. It was nothing more than lawful force to prevent crime and protect property.

The crime had already been committed.

Reasonable force to prevent crime is one thing - force to recover stolen property (which might breaks an evidence trail) and to detain or restrain a suspect no longer engaged in any criminal acts isn't the same, is it?

 

[morqthana]

When I buy my bus company I'm gonna employ this chap as the driver and mottie as the conductor......I will know my bus and passengers will be safe as houses.

Until they both abandon your bus and all its passengers leaving the engine running and they keys inside.

 

[Mottie]

Nope...

Force Must Cease When the Threat Does: You must stop using force once the danger has passed. Continuing to attack a person who is no longer a threat (e.g., someone running away or incapacitated) could result in your own prosecution

If you’re talking about me, what other force did you and ellal think I used then? Did you see any continuation of an attack?

 

[noseall]

What other force did you and ellal think I used then? Did you see any continuation of an attack?

I'm not talking about your particular heroics. I was referring to MBK's naivety reagards the law.

I think the first time around of posting, someone mentioned chasing after a fleeing scrote and beating them with a weapon, after the threat had gone. I said that would be illegal. I think you can work out what happened for the next forty pages.

 

[Mottie]

One look at the face is enough...

And you really think that a look at the face is enough? That would be laughed out of any court in this land if the prosecution offered that up as evidence, you absolute plonker.

Mind you, at least you admit running down a street brandishing a weapon

No, I didn’t. I was trying to offer him tea and sympathy, just like you would have done……