Bus driver sacked OMG

[King Billy]

And you really think that a look at the face is enough? That would be laughed out of any court in this land if the prosecution offered that up as evidence, you absolute plonker.

This isn't "any court in the land". It can't even be considered as a court of public opinion.

 

[King Billy]

For good reason

Is there ever a good reason to desert your primary responsibility?

 

[King Billy]

But it suits the culture warriors here to make out that he was sacked for his have-a-go actions so that they can compete with each other in the "if I'd been the driver I would have..." chest beating stakes.

The wannabe Charles Bronsons?

 

[King Billy]

And all the while, no one has stopped to ask what Metroline are doing running buses without enviro stop start technology.

I think it was mentioned at one point in one article that the engine had automatically stopped. But the keys were still inside, in gear and press the accelerator and it would have restarted.

 

[King Billy]

Himmy, with ifs and buts your fantasies don't become reality.
Coming from you, never having seen a day of work, it's simply a schizophrenic vision.

This happened down the road from me, in the once civilised Richmond.
With the midget in charge these doctors and lawyers are freely attacking us, safe in the knowledge that they will never be caught.
I wish someone would've clubbed them in the head and make them into a pulp with a scaffold pole.

Another one who believes his own febrile imagination.

 

[Mottie]

You called the police when they were breaking the steering lock, then you reported it to the police again when you retrieved the bike?

No, read my post again. I was questioning the statement that said I should have called the police, hence the question mark at the end of that sentence. I wouldn’t have even been connected to the police before they would have made off with my bike.

 

[Mottie]

Another one who believes his own febrile imagination.

I often find that those that continually sign up under new names often make the same mistake of using a particular word or phrase that gives themselves away. Febrile. A quick search of that word shows one prolific user of that word that confirms who you were. On my ignore list you go. Bye.

 

[pete01]

And if you don't think their reason for abandoning their duty of care to your paying customers, and their duty to take care of a company asset worth hundreds of thousands of pounds, was a good one, what then?

Job in the office?

 

[johnny2007]

Were the two people attacking the jewellers a doctor and a lawyer?

Accordingly to leftists, every single one of their new voters recruited on our shores, is a resource, a lawyer, a doctor, accountant, etc.

I wish you'd do something like that - you would so enjoy your appearance in court.

If the mob sorted them out there wouldn't be any need for police attendance and court cases: money saved there.

I often find that those that continually sign up under new names often make the same mistake of using a particular word or phrase that gives themselves away. Febrile. A quick search of that word shows one prolific user of that word that confirms who you were. On my ignore list you go. Bye.

I spotted the latest Himmy within seconds of his appearance.
The usernames give it away immediately.
The nutcase is liking his own posts

 

[motorbiking]

Nope...

Force Must Cease When the Threat Does: You must stop using force once the danger has passed. Continuing to attack a person who is no longer a threat (e.g., someone running away or incapacitated) could result in your own prosecution

Wrong law dummy

 

[motorbiking]

If you’re talking about me, what other force did you and ellal think I used then? Did you see any continuation of an attack?

When the thief attempted to lift your bike you had a right to stop him. You may use reasonable force and have a common law defence. When he ran away that became a statutory defence as per the law I posted.

Nosenout has referred to the common law self defence excuse only. He’s confused… again.

 

[King Billy]

No, read my post again. I was questioning the statement that said I should have called the police, hence the question mark at the end of that sentence. I wouldn’t have even been connected to the police before they would have made off with my bike.

Called the police while they were breaking my steering lock and about to make off with it? How quick do you think they would have responded? Ten more seconds and they’d have been away with it. Good old vigilante justice was dished out. Practically got a pat on the back from the police when I did report it.

So you told the police that, with a scaffold pole, you interrupted the potential thief, the thief ran away, ((end of crime and no threat of injury to you), you then chased him down the street with a scaffold pole as a a weapon, threatening to hit him with it.
And you expect us to believe you when you tell us the police congratulated you?
When did this happen, in the 1950's? When coppers supposedly cuffed naughty children around the ear?

 

[motorbiking]

Nothing requires you to stop attempting to apprehend a criminal, just because they are no longer in the act of committing an indictable offence. Your right to use reasonable force continues while they remain at large.

 

[King Billy]

I often find that those that continually sign up under new names often make the same mistake of using a particular word or phrase that gives themselves away. Febrile. A quick search of that word shows one prolific user of that word that confirms who you were. On my ignore list you go. Bye.

Shall we apply your logic to the word 'leftie'?

Oh look, there's half a page of numerous usernames (only looked at the first page of results) all being used by one person.
Ivor W, member 294929, SirGallahad, etc, etc.
There's so many I'd be here all day

Let's try the word 'Himmy', see how many different usernames that person has:

Wow, all these usernames being used by one poster!

Unless your theory is as frail as your intellect.
And, according to your search, I am or have been: Ban-all-sheds, durhamplumber, transam, Mottie, Ian H,
And I don't appear in the first half a page.
Your creativity of interpreting results and actual events according to your imagination is well established.

Do you understand the word 'confabulation'? It describes the process of remembering the world and its events as you wish them to have occurred, rather than actual reality.

It was recently used to describe Boris Johnson's memory of events. You seem to share the same problem as Boris.

 

[King Billy]

The nutcase is liking his own posts

Another that suffers from confabulation.
The function does not exist to like your own posts.
But if it gives you some sort of comfort, you behave like a dog and lick your own post.
I suspect it would give you more satisfaction than rolling aound on the floor.