Police officer attacked with a sledgehammer and gets a fractured spine...

as in they didn't know they were genuine police?

I think so. But the reporting has been terrible.

But GBH with intent may be where the jury struggled.

I did wonder about that. But I've not seen it reported anywhere that he argued there was no intent as a defence to that particular charge. The only defence he seems to have made is that he was defending someone else.

Have you found any decent reports which go into more detail.
 
I think so. But the reporting has been terrible.



I did wonder about that. But I've not seen it reported anywhere that he argued there was no intent as a defence to that particular charge. The only defence he seems to have made is that he was defending someone else.

Have you found any decent reports which go into more detail.
No, the picture I get from the defence is that they were a bunch of fools, who intended to cause criminal damage and weren't prepared for a fight. I don't think that was helped much by the prosecution, who seemed to go along with the idea.
 
I never mentioned tourism ref to Trump

As to your other remarks that’s a porki pie ( again)

Retribution Noseall is the name punishment to fit the crime

You can plead there human rights as per usual
And make excuses / deflection for thete muderous violent acts

But hey ho tis who you are Noseall
An RWR fruit cake :giggle: :giggle: ;) With yer ead up yer wat sit :LOL:

Transam prides his self on his integrity and fairness :cool: :cool: :cool:
How come you haven't blocked nosefeckall yet?
There are people here who want to scrap all trials.

And laws.
You being one of them.
In fact...
Representative of the population, I imagine.
Don't worry - it's beyond everyone who doesn't understand what trials are for, how they work, and what things like "evidence" and "testimony" are.



Johnny - you're not going to finish very high in the chest-beating stakes if you can only come up with lukewarm slaps on the wrist like those.
In English?!?!
Yes, I knew that.

His defence seems to be that he was defending his co-defendants against excessive force and also that they weren't aware of the status of the other side. The reporting hasn't been great.
Had they not broken into private property armed with sledgehammers, they wouldn't have been in that situation.
They consciously decided to break the law and should've been punished accordingly.
Attempted murder for the MF who broke the sergeant spine (30 years in max security prison) and 10 years in solitary confinement for all the other terrorists.
Unfortunately we live in UK where criminals run the show and law abiding citizens must pay the consequences and worship them.
 
How come you haven't blocked nosefeckall yet?

You being one of them.
In fact...






In English?!?!

Had they not broken into private property armed with sledgehammers, they wouldn't have been in that situation.
They consciously decided to break the law and should've been punished accordingly.
Attempted murder for the MF who broke the sergeant spine (30 years in max security prison) and 10 years in solitary confinement for all the other terrorists.
Unfortunately we live in UK where criminals run the show and law abiding citizens must pay the consequences and worship them.
they aren't off the hook yet. They can be tried for different offences. They've already done 18 months on remand.
 
Had they not broken into private property armed with sledgehammers, they wouldn't have been in that situation.
They consciously decided to break the law and should've been punished accordingly.
Attempted murder for the MF who broke the sergeant spine (30 years in max security prison) and 10 years in solitary confinement for all the other terrorists.
Unfortunately we live in UK where criminals run the show and law abiding citizens must pay the consequences and worship them.

One report says she was luckily wearing a stab vest, otherwise the damage could have been massively worse.

The reporting has been hopeless. Another bit I have just found says the defendant had just been pepper sprayed and he heard one of his co-accused screaming in pain so he just lashed out with his sledgehammer.
 
they aren't off the hook yet. They can be tried for different offences. They've already done 18 months on remand.
I know, but would they ever be punished for what they've done?
Surely they're safe as long as the leftists are in charge.
The reporting has been hopeless. Another bit I have just found says the defendant had just been pepper sprayed and he heard one of his co-accused screaming in pain so he just lashed out with his sledgehammer.
Boll@x!
These are fairy tales invented by smartass solicitors.
Seen this day in day out in my days.
 
I fully appreciate the legal system can't be locking everyone up for decades, nor should it. However it really annoys me when someone is the victim of crime in such a way that will possibly/probably leave them with lifelong issues to whatever degree (e.g. this victim might now have back issues that increase with time, pain etc) and the fecker that caused it ends up with a p1ss poor punishment or indeed no punishment whatsoever.

I've said before on here, a few years back an idiot (to get clicks online) went into a supermarket dressed as a superhero. he was walking around frantically and then approached a female staff member. he did one of those high kick things to her body, causing her to go flying back and landing on the ground.

I'd lock that fecker up for a minimum of 5 years.
 
The other problem is the officer may go for a civil claim, but I doubt that matey has any money, so that will go nowhere.
 
I fully appreciate the legal system can't be locking everyone up for decades, nor should it. However it really annoys me when someone is the victim of crime in such a way that will possibly/probably leave them with lifelong issues to whatever degree (e.g. this victim might now have back issues that increase with time, pain etc) and the fecker that caused it ends up with a p1ss poor punishment or indeed no punishment whatsoever.
That what the Criminal Injuries Compensation is for.
 
That what the Criminal Injuries Compensation is for.
Yeah and I'm sure it adequately compensates in all cases. Anywhere from £1k - £500k depending on severity. Someone might have a relatively minor ongoing condition caused by the act, how much are they getting? They've still to live with the condition regardless year in year out.

Scum need treated like scum.
 
Yeah and I'm sure it adequately compensates in all cases. Anywhere from £1k - £500k depending on severity. Someone might have a relatively minor ongoing condition caused by the act, how much are they getting? They've still to live with the condition regardless year in year out.

Scum need treated like scum.
Compensation and punishment are different things, I’m not sure she can claim if nobody has been convicted of the assault. Either way they should be punished
 
I’m not sure she can claim if nobody has been convicted of the assault. Either way they should be punished

They should be punished if not convicted?

Strange attitude to the law from someone who is some sort of legal professional.
 
Back
Top