I usually am
'UK has been colonised by immigrants'
- Thread starter motorbiking
- Start date
Apart from the fact that you are factually incorrect, you obviously don't care about certain 'types' of human beings...
And that attitude of yours then transcends into vilifying one of the best voluntary organisations in the UK that saves lives without prejudice...
Let's hope one of yours or someone you know doesn't need their help!
Pantomime time?I usually am
I think it mainly comes down to the theme I have been discussing over the past year or so. Voters across the West are anxious and restless. For a range of complex, interconnected reasons, they want things to change, but with no real idea why. I was reading an article in the Washington Post today saying the same.
The slogan to sum it up might be:
'What do we want?'
'We don't know'
'When do we want it?'
'All the time'
If its OK for the likes of the Palestinians to be colonised, why is not ok for Britain.
By the way I am opposed to the colonisation of any country.
And they are getting stranger every day.
Anyway interesting article in the Financial Times.
The rich world evades hard choices on immigration https://share.google/XYVz13EjeUKM4zjEg
- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 11,360
- Reaction score
- 994
- Country
No, you need NI contributions. They will be entitled to Pension Credit, but that is not the same as State Pension.
Most immigrants on work or family visas have a condition on their visa stating "No Recourse to Public Funds," meaning they cannot claim Pension Credit at all.
Shouldn't they have cured it by now, with the amount of money they've had?Mainly cancer research for me mate...
The boss was last known to get £140k. All from those quid coins that joe public chucked in a tin.
Plus a squadron of senior management on juicy salaries.
National charitites stink. Find a good local cause.
I really wish they had.
Not much is it to run a big company like that.
How much does big pharma get from providing treatments not cures?
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2005
- Messages
- 4,513
- Reaction score
- 662
- Country
Dear Pipsqueak, seeking asylum is legal and sometimes justified we all get that, we are also entitled to say no enough is enough.
The current UK system rewards dangerous, unfair routes, disadvantages genuine refugees elsewhere, and erodes public consent and trust, the route used by these people via boats is viewed at least immoral, queue jumping and dangerous, putting uneccesary lives at risk including the RNLI and Coastguards, and possibly other people requiring rescuing at sea who are in danger by accident or unintentinally so.
So what's factualy incorrect about me saying they are immoral queue jumpers, most are young men able to take advantage of this route. I stand by what i say and believe it is factually correct.
RNLI i have mixed feelings about, what it ABSOLUTELY shouldn't be is a replacement service for the Costguard. Sorry no i disagree. The Coast guard needs to step up(or step down and let France deal with them or when they realise its too dangerous stop), the same for the Air ambulances that are kept afloat by charities, thats also fcked up, no im not a bigoted racist because of that either stroppy pants.
So whilst i have been a life long contributor to RNLI sorry not anymore, and i have most probably over the years contributed enough to buy some decent equipment for them, have you? Does that entitle me to judge them? Only by my personal opinon yes, and yes i can chose not to give them anymore money on that ground also, so there, put that in your pipe.
And i heard a squeak about you moaning they come here as it's easy to speak english lolz
They come to the UK because we i would guess are near the top globally in places to set foot and claim asylum: (Really not just about easy to talk English you joker, id happily learn Russian if it promised the same...)
Here is why
- Predictable law
- Non-violent enforcement
- Due process
- A functioning welfare state
- Media scrutiny and NGOs
- Very low chance of physical harm
Another top reason allegedly is they have friends n family here also, who have previously come here illegally or immorally or not.
"You obviously don't care about certain 'types' of human beings..."
We as a nation are renowned for caring, despite many people attempting to beat us with the age old 'racist', 'slavery' 'coloniser' sticks etc, hence we attract migrants from all over the world.
I can't think of many countries outside of us and perhaps parts of Europe that would return the gesture i mean if the shoe was on the other foot and we rocked up at their doors.. how would we be received? I bet the outcome wouldn't just be a nasty tweet or a phone call to the Council complaining or a protest, no it would be much more direct.
My objection is we have to kerb this spending, check your council out, how much is spent on Care for Adults and Children already, it's a whopper, its a monster over every thing its out of control already, and if you're an auditor you know all of these 'pots' move around...so much waste its rotten to the core how we operate as councils, the way we operate.
We need to take a leaf out the swiss in how they tax locally at council level, it works and would transform us too.. but we are too busy fighting over Paedos and corruption. Bare with me here, we are getting to the crux.
The difference is, our fundamental beliefs, you shout all you want but i don't ever believe in this magic money tree socialist view will ever work, we just cannot support the world with our economy, there are too many systems here open to abuse, Government should treat all money as hard-earned, scarce, and accountable, but no they rip it off us in taxes and spaff it up the wall on anyone and everyone. That hand that takes is nothing like the hand that gives.
I believe in earned prosperity, local economies, limited but competent government, and a safety net that supports effort rather than replaces it.
That’s not socialism, it’s pragmatic civic capitalism. Hence why your misunderstanding just assumes hate. Thats on you.
Markets with rules yes
Strong local economies yes
Wealth creation encouraged yes
Waste opposed yes
The rest of you throbbers on this thread replying to me, i have you on ignore for good reason, so if you don't get a reply you know why, you're mostly trolls or worse, but for some reason i like Ellal, they is not a bad person imho, despite the ranting.
Last edited:
It is meant to be a charity!
Yes but why would people be expected to work for free? I assume work still needs doing....maybe im wrong, it has to happen one day.
There's a lot of difference between free and £140k pa. I suppose it's not huge compared with what company directors get, but I often wonder how much of the money collected gets to those in need.
That survey seems to be at least fifteen years out of date.
The current CEO gets double that, I believe.
But she is running an organisation with a £700m budget and 4,000 staff.
Similar threads
