Roads that give cyclists priority.

Joined
16 Sep 2006
Messages
8,120
Reaction score
2,648
Location
Fife
Country
United Kingdom
What are your thoughts on this? Would you like to see them in your area? Should it become the norm where possible?

 
We have old railway lines and canals made into cycle and pedestrian ways only so this is by no means the first, we also have footpaths in residential areas on which cyclists are allowed.

But the problem is where those who do the maintenance have no idea of what it is like to walk or cycle in the area.

Alongside the river Dee from Shotton to Chester the top of the river bank was made into a walking and cycle track. There was a chicane Shotton end, to stop motor vehicles, with a locked gate for maintenance vehicles, and then at the old ferry crossing this
1779970394124.png
type of barrier, which did not comply with agreed dimensions and so some bikes would not fit, this was a circular route, connecting to the old train track as well, and I have seen groups of cyclists helping a guy get his bike over the bars, as he had a 2-mile ride home one way and a 10-mile ride home in reverse.

Also seen again in Shotton, signs saying enforced cycle way, 1779970729236.pngthis is the optional sign 1779970758216.png and then worded signs in English only to say no cycling on the pavement. Since vehicle road also paved, i.e. not a dirt track, clearly person did not understand English never mind Welsh or Polish.

Here in Mid-Wales, the problem is Aramco barriers, being hit by a motor vehicle is always bad, but when trapped between a motor vehicle and Aramco barriers, that's a death sentence, unless cycling and walking not permitted i.e. motorways, or path other side of them, then Aramco barriers should be banned.

The distance we should give cyclists here in Wales is unworkable, with roads far to narrow to pass a cyclist and some common sense is required. Overtaking yes should wait, but when travelling in opposite direction?

In Chester there is an unusable cycle track, due to the drop pavements into properties along the route, so cyclists ride on the road.

Also seen routes where cycles can ride wrong way down one way streets, could see reason, to avoid dangerous roundabout, but no signs warning motorists of on coming cycles.

As to e-bikes, there rules are blurred, like 250 watts on a continuous basis, why the "continuous basis" that means can have a 350 watt motor as long as it does not give out 350 watts throughout the speed range. The throttle depends on age of the bike, they were allowed with early ebikes, then latter ones only up to 4 MPH, so we have a whole range of ebikes, and unless someone goes silly like fitting a 1000 watt motor, we don't know what is permitted with second hand bikes.

The cargo bikes it seems you must peddle it, but no direct link pedals to wheels, peddles drive a generator, and it seems that complies.

Again to allow cargo bikes, the posts shown clearly don't work, so there is no way to physically stop motorbikes.
 
What are your thoughts on this? Would you like to see them in your area? Should it become the norm where possible?


108907445-15852919-image-a-9_1779898956027.jpg

looks a bit photo shopped, even the garages and cars on the drives are gone.

I imagine they claim the roads are quieter and safer.... with zero traffic.

its hard to see the benefit to those who previously used the road:
 
England's first 'cycle street' comes to bike-loving Cambridge despite complaints from residents and motorists

Of course motorists complain. They complain about any change whatsoever to the status quo if it in any way restricts their ability to drive wherever, whenever, and however they please.

And not at all a loaded question in the article

"Should cycling and walking always take priority over driving, even if it inconveniences motorists and local residents?"

How about "Should motor vehicles always have priority, even if it inconveniences cyclists and pedestrians?"
 
Click-bait from the cr@ppy Daily Mail.
Click-bait on here.
You're right, the rubbish DM the only place to report on this! How very dare they.






 
Of course motorists complain. They complain about any change whatsoever to the status quo if it in any way restricts their ability to drive wherever, whenever, and however they please.

And not at all a loaded question in the article

"Should cycling and walking always take priority over driving, even if it inconveniences motorists and local residents?"

How about "Should motor vehicles always have priority, even if it inconveniences cyclists and pedestrians?"
How about "Should motor vehicles always have priority, even if it inconveniences or endangers cyclists and pedestrians?"
 
You're right, the rubbish DM the only place to report on this! How very dare they.


From the last link:
"One of the busiest cycle routes in Cambridge, used by 3,000 cyclists at peak times, will be redesigned into a “Cycle Street” to prioritise cyclists and pedestrians over motorists. "
So its a busy cycling route already, and they are making it safer. Maybe they could apply it to some other streets where there is potential for higher cycle traffic, to cut down on car use.

The Dutch have many low car streets (Autolow), so its been shown to work.
 
You're right, the rubbish DM the only place to report on this! How very dare they.






Cos all it does is create argument and antagony towards cyclists. As seen in every other reel that comes through on FB. It gets 'ruddy boring.
Why is there a need to also have it on a DIY forum??
 
Cos all it does is create argument and antagony towards cyclists. As seen in every other reel that comes through on FB. It gets 'ruddy boring.
Why is there a need to also have it on a DIY forum??
Eh?

What?!?

Are you trolling?

Little hint for you, a little tip. Check the title this section of the forum has ;)
 
108907445-15852919-image-a-9_1779898956027.jpg

looks a bit photo shopped, even the garages and cars on the drives are gone.

I imagine they claim the roads are quieter and safer.... with zero traffic.

its hard to see the benefit to those who previously used the road:
And that bloody woman cyclist is on the wrong bloody side of the road.
 
lycra wanchors should not be on the roads,they pay no tax have no insurance and weave about yapping amongst themselves blocking the transport which pays for the upkeep or lack of,while these leeches who contribute nothing to it, apart from being mobile chicanes to the vehicles who have to pay for the priviledge,they should be taxed and insured and only allowed on them under the cover of darkness......
 
Back
Top