Unbloomingbelievable.

There is no point having a third trial, as the same thing will happen again. These scum are so obviously guilty that the only reason any jurer would find them not guilty is if that jurer was muslim. Therefore, there were muslims on the jury. This is what happens when people from a low-trust society live in a high-trust one.

It comes down to immigration again. These people should not be in the country, and if they are, they should not be allowed to hold any position in law, politics or anything in authority over others.

Lammy and Co want to end trial by jury, which would be very wrong. However, as the country is at present, trial by jury cannot possibly work.

Blame Blair for this unholy mess.
 
. .., and if they are, they should not be allowed to hold any position in law, politics or anything in authority over others.
So any immigrant or descendant of an immigrant can only do certain jobs, that do not entail any kind of supervision. :rolleyes:
Institutionalised racism in other words.
I bet you'd still not be satisfied.
...These people should not be in the country, ...
Your hate must be consuming you at a great rate.
 
The lawyer representing those pieces of siht should be ashamed of himself. What they did was indefensible. But he defends lowlifes like Sturgeon etc so hardly unsurprising.
 
Last edited:
The lawyer representing those pieces of siht should be ashamed of himself. What they did was indefensible. But he defends lowlifes lie Sturgeon etc so hardly unsurprising.

1780071727375.png
 
Do we know the rough outline of the defence. Is it, for instance, that the copper didn't identify himself.
 
The lawyer representing
Thick skinned and greedy.

You don't seriously believe the lawyer sees this as anything other than a feather in his cap. He will proudly tout it as a calling card too. There are plenty of wealthy Muslims out there and he'll gladly take their cash.

Funny how the RWR suddenly develop a moral compass when it suits them.
 
Do we know the rough outline of the defence. Is it, for instance, that the copper didn't identify himself.

I might be wrong but I thought I read they were claiming self defence. The video would have been studied in minute detail against various testimonies so who knows?, maybe more detail will be released in time.
 
According to the news just now, neither of these two brothers will face any charges since a Jury could not reach a decision. No third trial. Thie judicial system is a joke and why it needs a shakeup.
 
It does seem to be a perverse verdict but you can’t carry on prosecuting until you get the results you want, this isn’t Trumpf’s Amerrica. Doubtless under Lammy’s plans a judge only trial would have given it all short shrift. If the rwr’s condemned the ICE murders they would earn some respect but many comments are blatantly political.
 
It does seem to be a perverse verdict but you can’t carry on prosecuting until you get the results you want, this isn’t Trumpf’s Amerrica. Doubtless under Lammy’s plans a judge only trial would have given it all short shrift. If the rwr’s condemned the ICE murders they would earn some respect but many comments are blatantly political.
Nothing political in seeing a female police lady smashed full on in her face and her nose broken by a man, then the other thug attacking the other officer. Justice has not been served. What sort of message does this send out to all the other thugs.
 
Back
Top