- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 3,852
- Reaction score
- 202
- Country

Did you not listen to his speech?He sounds like a God. Why is he leaving?
So you're asking me to repeat it for you?
Lazy barsteward.

Did you not listen to his speech?He sounds like a God. Why is he leaving?
Its cheaper when you don't have to factor in the profit margin for the customerLabour just repainted the trains![]()

great - ticket prices will fall.. oh wait.Its cheaper when you don't have to factor in the profit margin for the customer

left me wondering what country he'd been prime minister of.Did you not listen to his speech?
So you're asking me to repeat it for you?
Lazy barsteward.

Ticket prices would have continued to rise under private ownership.great - ticket prices will fall.. oh wait.
Any data to support your theory?the government has spent millions renegotiating rolling stock contracts and taking on liabilities.
Private firms that lease out trains for Britain’s railway have seen their profits treble in a year, with more than £400m paid in dividends, official figures show.
The rolling stock companies paid out a total of £409.7m to shareholders and profit margins rose to 41.6% in 2022-23, according to the Office of Rail and Road, as the rest of the railway was told to make swingeing cuts and salaries were frozen.
Unions have urged a windfall tax on the huge dividends, describing the financing of trains as a “racket” without risk to the leasing firms.

Yep - he was the best they could find. Andy Burnham wasn't even an MP at the last election. It will be interesting to see how Burnham, claims a mandate.Starmer was always a harmless Trojan Horse that was used by Labour to get themselves into power.
Now they're here, they can install a proper lefty leader they actually want, who the voters wouldn't have elected.
Just standard Fabian Society stuff. Vote for one thing, get something else.

Feel free to explain how nationalising OpCos, impacts the profits of RosCos, who have all enjoyed the ability to renegotiate their terms for additional fees.Ticket prices would have continued to rise under private ownership.
Any data to support your theory?
Here's a start:
more taxes turned into profitthe government has spent millions renegotiating rolling stock contracts and taking on liabilities.
He turned the Labour party around from a post-Corbyn shambles to a sound beating of Tories two years later.
You have to service the historic (private sector) debtgreat - ticket prices will fall.. oh wait.
the government has spent millions renegotiating rolling stock contracts and taking on liabilities.
The EA have re-started inspections on sewages works, bringing some responsibility to the issue that was severely lacking under the Tories. This required recruiting more EA officers. Actual action.Much of this means diddly squat.
e.g. tougher on water companies. Maybe that just means the previous agreement was complete and utter sh1te, and the 'tougher' agreement is slightly less sh1te but still sh1te.
It's the delivery of stuff that's important, not words like lifted, reintroduced, approved, expanded, supported etc etc.

What was the point of nationalising an already nationalised network?You have to service the historic (private sector) debt
Because it bad for the free markets’s reputation if private sector companies are kept afloat by public subsidyWhat was the point of nationalising an already nationalised network?