Labour leadership challenge

[motorbiking]

All the competition have been tucked up nicely with Jobs. Even Rachel Reeves will keep her ministerial salary.

So we enter a new era, where the PM of a government, wasn't even an MP and has never won a leadership race.

I think Al Carns (Action Man) would be a much better choice as leader. I hope he declares he's in the running.

He'd be smart to sit this one out, and challenge Burnham, in a year. There is still enough time before the next GE for another change. There are going to be plenty of moderates in Labour who don't like the taste of this coronation.

 

[King Billy]

All the competition have been tucked up nicely with Jobs. Even Rachel Reeves will keep her ministerial salary.

The benefits of a orderly transition, keep the experienced able people in the cabinet.

So we enter a new era, where the PM of a government, wasn't even an MP and has never won a leadership race.

He is now, and he has the support of the Labour Party. It would seem, and that's sufficient in our democratic system.

There are going to be plenty of moderates in Labour who don't like the taste of this coronation.

Such as?
The Party is a broad church, it would be surprising if there was 100% agreement. That is why some are considering a wasteful contest. It's the nature of politics.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

So the fake leadership election is now dead, nobody will challenge Burnham. Everyone has been tucked up nicely with jobs. Andy will take over in a month.

Nah. Starmer needs time for his farewell tour, during which he'll gift Gibraltar to his EU puppetmasters.

 

[motorbiking]

Seems voters aren't impressed with Labour's shenanigans.

Voting intention 2025-2026

If there were a general election held tomorrow, which party would you vote for?

yougov.com

 

[King Billy]

Nah. Starmer needs time for his farewell tour, during which he'll gift Gibraltar to his EU puppetmasters.

Have you researched whether Starmer has the power to do anything like that?
Or is this yet another of your silly wild claims?

 

[King Billy]

Seems voters aren't impressed with Labour's shenanigans.

Voting intention 2025-2026

If there were a general election held tomorrow, which party would you vote for?

yougov.com

Past performance is not a reliable indicator or guarantee of future results.

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

Have you researched whether Starmer has the power to do anything like that?
Or is this yet another of your silly wild claims?

Whether Starmer has the power to do something never stands in his way. He likes to exceed his powers and ignore parliament constantly, getting frequent and increasing chastising from the speaker for it.

The latest UK-wide ban for everyone* from social media wasn't even announced or discussed in parliament, he just announced it. Pure evil.

* Presented as a ban for children, in reality everyone would now need to prove they're not a child, uploading their passport or whatever personal details to random websites anywhere in the world, which anyone with any sense wouldn't do. Just Labour using the "for the children" excuse to impose control, as normal.

 

[motorbiking]

Whether Starmer has the power to do something never stands in his way. He likes to exceed his powers and ignore parliament constantly, getting frequent and increasing chastising from the speaker for it.

The latest UK-wide ban for everyone* from social media wasn't even announced or discussed in parliament, he just announced it. Pure evil.

* Presented as a ban for children, in reality everyone would now need to prove they're not a child, uploading their passport or whatever personal details to random websites anywhere in the world, which anyone with any sense wouldn't do. Just Labour using the "for the children" excuse to impose control, as normal.

Digital ID via the back door.

 

[King Billy]

Have you researched whether Starmer has the power to do anything like that?
Or is this yet another of your silly wild claims?

Whether Starmer has the power to do something never stands in his way.

I'll take that as a "NO" and a "YES" in that order.

He likes to exceed his powers and ignore parliament constantly, getting frequent and increasing chastising from the speaker for it.

You're confusing Boris with Sir Kier.


Your cliche filled rants are becoming more desperate and moronic each time.

The latest UK-wide ban for everyone* from social media wasn't even announced or discussed in parliament, he just announced it. Pure evil.

I didn't realise the under 16 ban would affect you. My commiserations.

 

[blup]

So the fake leadership election is now dead, nobody will challenge Burnham. Everyone has been tucked up nicely with jobs. Andy will take over in a month.

Apparently he’s a little peeved that Starmmer didn’t stay on till September as he’s now got to get some policies together earlier than expected.

 

[aveatry]

Whether Starmer has the power to do something never stands in his way. He likes to exceed his powers and ignore parliament constantly, getting frequent and increasing chastising from the speaker for it.

The latest UK-wide ban for everyone* from social media wasn't even announced or discussed in parliament, he just announced it. Pure evil.

* Presented as a ban for children, in reality everyone would now need to prove they're not a child, uploading their passport or whatever personal details to random websites anywhere in the world, which anyone with any sense wouldn't do. Just Labour using the "for the children" excuse to impose control, as normal.

They tried "its to prevent illegals from working" -- we told them to F off - we see you.
So now they are using "its to protect children" they are using the same tactics as they did with covid which worked so well people were driving on their own with a mask on (made out of an old shirt )

 

[Brigadier]

Did you mention reform types in it ?

Twice I think.

But I think you got away with it

 

[Dec27]

Billy Bot is on one today!! I’d say as per usual, but that might be a cliche….

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

I'll take that as a "NO" and a "YES" in that order.


You're confusing Boris with Sir Kier.


Your cliche filled rants are becoming more desperate and moronic each time.


I didn't realise the under 16 ban would affect you. My commiserations.

You'd be less embarassing to yourself if you actually followed the news and/or parliament before making stupid statements in which you sound certain while being completely wrong.

Starmer is being regularly criticised by the speaker, in very blunt terms recently.

Try using google if you don't know, instead of advertising your ignorance.

 

[King Billy]

You'd be less embarassing to yourself if you actually followed the news and/or parliament before making stupid statements in which you sound certain while being completely wrong.

Remember this?

People with no constructive arguments usually turn to insults.