Man who punched female officer at Manchester airport jailed.

[aveatry]

You wanted me to post an image of my nearest post box, which will have a unique identity number on it.
And because I refused, you imagined that I must live in Pakistan.

So you built a conspiracy theory around your imagined scenario. Sound familiar?

You dont have to include any identifiable numbers on a post box.
Until you thought of that excuse you said that you were a house bound person who doesn’t own a phone and you only had one hand.

 

[King Billy]

Dummy --- This is DEI and the reason for the little coppers.

In May 1990, the minimum height requirement was dropped by the Metropolitan Police, and other police forces had followed suit by September 1990. No British force now requires its recruits to be of any minimum height.

Dummy. The height restriction was dropped before the introduction of DEI as a policy.

But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders.

 

[aveatry]

Dummy. The height restriction was dropped before the introduction of DEI as a policy.

Its in action DEI before it was given its name
DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ) is the meaningful shift towards fairness, equity

But that's is irrelevant. You don't send two slightly built policewoman and one male officer to arrest two burly known violent offenders.

Right so its the little coppers own fault for getting their nose smashed to pieces then. - Keep defending your "brother"

 

[King Billy]

Its in action DEI before it was given its name
DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ) is the meaningful shift towards fairness, equity

About 10 years after the height restriction removed, the DEI policy was implemented.
So the Met drop the height restriction, and ten years later someone thinks, 'Oh, we should give that policy a name.'
What did they call in other forces, and in other countries that also dropped the height restriction?

Right so its the little coppers own fault for getting their nose smashed to pieces then. -

The person responsible for sending ill-equipped under-staffed officers should share some responsibility.
The officers that attended had little choice in attending.

Keep defending your "brother"

Still weaponising your imagined scenario of my situation because you are denied any real personal information of mine.

 

[yorksbuilder]

Does it matter if the copper is little? They can stamp on a terrorists head just as well if they are 5'7" as at 6' 4" can't they?

 

[Koolpc]

I've stated for as long as I've been here, i do not reveal any personal information because people like you will weaponise.
And you've proven me to be sensible in my decision because in absence of any personal information, you imagine something, which you then weaponise.


If you think weaponising your imagined personal information of others, and building on that to be abusive is your version of 'trying to inject a bit of humour', it's no wonder that you live alone in a bedsit, with no friends, and need to imagine you're a dog.

Obviously, going by your post, you can't read!

Your posts are full of hatred for the UK. But, you can't see that. You are truly Britishophobic. You attack anyone who is loyal to the flag.

Yea, I may be lonely, and live in one room, but, I am 100% behind those that stand up for our country. For those that have fought for this country, like my dear Dad who served in the Army during WWII.

It's obvious that you don't give a flying F for this country. You just want your own blinkered extremist Islamic ways forced onto everyone.

We all know what you are....you can't hide here boyo....

 

[johnny2007]

You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.

All the posts you have linked do not match what you are assuming.
You should Google "assume acronym"...
Is the sun shining in Fantasyland?

The person responsible for sending ill-equipped under-staffed officers should share some responsibility.
The officers that attended had little choice in attending.

They were not ill equipped.
In fact, they had guns and tazers.
But because of woke people like you they are supposed to police the streets with their hands tied behind their back.
In America or Pakistan or South Arabia, the 2 ******* would've been made to kneel down at gunpoint and if they didn't comply, shot without hesitation.
Note, this treatment happens in Muslim countries too.
So my question to your beloved criminals is: why do you expect to get away with violence that will see you killed in your country?

 

[johnny2007]

You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.

BTW, how come you're so well informed if you joined only 6 months ago???

 

[motorbiking]

You admitted to be a member of the 'Blade Runners' group who were responsible for disabling the ULEZ cameras.
You've admitted to be active in that group. You've admitted to supporting the criminal damage committed by the group, describing them as Robin Hoods.
You've admitted to avoiding paying the ULEZ charge by opening your boot while moving.
You've admitted to covering your number plate, or intentionally spillng oil on it, to avoid the ULEZ charge.
You've suggested people intentionally muddy their plates so they can't be read.
You've described a child injured in a car accident caused by camera vandals as 'a casualty of war'.
You think that vandalising street furniture is not a criminal offence.
I'll let the forum decide on your willingness to commit vandalism.

You’re going to have to spell out the confession you are referring to.