Quite so - and you say that you are one of the (I would think very very few) people who have had at least some education about those topics, even if 50 years ago. I would imagine that most people have probably not even heard of the words, ever!
I have to say that those were 'a blast from the past' and no way in my conscious knowledge, having not attempted to do a google search I have no idea if I am anywhere close. However as a follow up to this I had a dream last night of watching one of my physics teachers drawing graphs on the blackboard:
But again I have no idea if that's BS or what they are or what the axes are
I therefore think that you underline the point I was making - that the vast majority of people who go to websites such as you recommended 'to learn' are probably going to have big problem doing that 'learning' since it would require them to understand graphs which have axes labelled 'entropy' or 'enthalpy', and Tables of data with columns labelled with those words, aren't they?
I don't disagree with that
Rather than 'usefully educating', sites that do that seem be going more down the road of trying to 'blind with science'
I recently had to 'learn' how to use the software to control the lights for the AmDram show, the previous 'tech guy' who had been saying for several shows that he intended to retire from the group - but despite me asking he'd always kept everything very close to his chest - suddenly announced a month before this show that he wouldn't be there any more. (He turned up once to collect the remainder of his kit stored there)
I reckon I spent at least 50 hours on YT and other 'help sites'. The problem with all of them has been the expectation that one has some idea how it works (which isn't the case for a newbie) and one can follow the speed they run at - that may sound silly but one regularly did this sweeping movement with the mouse and clicked on a box as the end of it, however slowing it down to ¼ speed it appeared she clicked on 3 boxes before stopping on and clicking the 4th, which was wrong - it was only 3 but one changed state when clicking on the adjacent box.
The biggest problem I had with it was weeding out who was right and who was wrong as as there are different methods of achieving the same thing depending on where one is working in the software and they all share the same the same 'dashboard' but one can't mix the methods. As an example in one mode a green tick has to be clicked to access something (IE a dimmer setting), in another mode the green tick saves that something (IE the dimmer setting which can then be adjusted after saving it) making it very easy to save an incorrect setting.
However all of them go far too deeply into the software far too quickly, initially All I wanted to do was be able to 'play' previously saved shows to see if any saved scenes would be suitable... Most of this show was based on previous saved scenes but having some murder mystery content an element of accusatory spotlights were required. And of course being AmDram the suspects never stood in the same place twice!!

so the spotlights were very hit and miss but with this director one has to do what "I'm the professional director" says.
EDIT: Oh dear waffle mode

Just how far can it move from adding power to a shed?