Andy’s wife is starting on a low for me.

What shocked me was that the dress cost so much and was not at all flattering. In any areas.

Absolutely ridiculous.
 
So the dress was too expensive and didn’t fit anyway. Wtf has that do with policy?
 
So the dress was too expensive and didn’t fit anyway. Wtf has that do with policy?
Laying into women on politics or politics adjacent based on clothing is routine amongst the tabloid press. I agree it's pointless and petty, but that's how some like to roll.
 
Laying into women on politics or politics adjacent based on clothing is routine amongst the tabloid press. I agree it's pointless and petty, but that's how some like to roll.
Sadly misogyny is never far below the surface and pops it's ugly head up repeatedly...

After only just over 24 hours in this case :rolleyes:
 
There should be a law to stop rich people helping people poorer than them
 
in fairness she would have made a packet as a an electric vehicle charging network director when the Clean Air Zone's were being rolled out, in cities like manchester - total coincidence Andy was mayor, no connection whatsoever

Ah - that will be the company she joined 7 years after her husband became mayor of a city which does not charge drivers for using clean air zones, no matter what they drive, and therefore does not incent people to buy EVs.
 
Ah - that will be the company she joined 7 years after her husband became mayor of a city which does not charge drivers for using clean air zones, no matter what they drive, and therefore does not incent people to buy EVs.
The scheme that never actually came into action as it was paused and then scrapped by said husband...

Not even 48 hours into a new regime, but some people like to invent 'conspiracies' due to their political bent ;)
 
Sadly misogyny is never far below the surface and pops it's ugly head up repeatedly...
Okay, okay. We all know wife beating is practically the national sport but will you give it a rest about bloody Iceland.
 
Ah, the op raises his head when it is pointed out the topic is misogynistic :rolleyes:

Guess it's time for...

 
Sadly misogyny is never far below the surface and pops it's ugly head up repeatedly...

After only just over 24 hours in this case :rolleyes:
I'd like to defend my comments.

You buy clothes for a purpose. Work clothes for protection, casual clothes to relax in. Glad rags to look really smart in.

Whether you buy Primark or Designer, you want it to fit and look good.

That didn't, pure and simple.
And for somebody to sell something at that price point that does not fulfill its basic brief is shocking.
 
Ah, the op raises his head when it is pointed out the topic is misogynistic :rolleyes:

Guess it's time for...

I’m not even going to look at that. Poor Icelandic women being bashed over the head for fun! Takes all sorts I suppose.
 
I'd like to defend my comments.

You buy clothes for a purpose. Work clothes for protection, casual clothes to relax in. Glad rags to look really smart in.

Whether you buy Primark or Designer, you want it to fit and look good.

That didn't, pure and simple.
And for somebody to sell something at that price point that does not fulfill its basic brief is shocking.
According to you :rolleyes:

The point is why the need to start a topic about her clothes at all?

So what role is she trying to fill, and what concern is it of yours?

She just happens to be the wife of our current PM...

Are you going to comment on the 'fashion sense' (as you see it) of every leader's partner?
 
Back
Top