UFH reliability

Joined
27 Aug 2003
Messages
69,778
Reaction score
2,885
Location
London
Country
United Kingdom
There seems to be a lot of recent topics reporting problems of one sort or another with their electric UFH.

Coincidence?

Are there similar numbers in the plumbing forum about wet systems?
 
Sponsored Links
Looking at the thread title BAS, I thought you were going to be talking about digital TV :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
Not had a problem with our actual UFH system which was installed in 2006 apart from with the thermostat controllers. We are on our second controller since installation and the second one has recently developed a fault. They are Timeguard controllers and from our experience they dont seem to be reliable / well made.
 
In early January I spent a night in a hotel, with the window open and the fan on but still too hot for comfort. The problem was UFH in the bathroom, which had no control. When I complained, I was told they used to have thermostats but the customers caused failures by kept messing about with them, so the thermostats were all replaced by relays driven by a central timer! :evil:
 
My parents house sole heating is from night storage underfloor electric, but in 25 years ago, and has now even any problems since dispight them going for the cheaper less protected version of the cable which was 'not suitable for burying in concrete. Although they did bury them themselves rather than have the builders do it.

The system is 'controled' using the induvidial circuit breakers in the CU and a imersion heater timer working through a relay. They did have a analog 'weather watcher' control unit but it never worked for them and was disconected very early on. Im sure there are systems that could be used now to automate it, but there so used to adjusting it and its such a long time period for temperature change it takes very little effort and works very well.

This year the replaced the relay as it had started getting louder, but thats the first replacment needed.


Daniel
 
Yes, there are problems with wet systems, but like the electric ones - unless there was a faulty cable (or pipe), or it's been damaged (eg with a wayward drill), then it's going to keep working for "a long time".

The mains things is you only get to hear about the faulty ones. People don't generally start threads with "my UFH is working fine, what should I do with it" :rolleyes:

Like electric, wet systems also suffer from "installation issues". One I spotted over in the plumbing section started with "the pipes were laid, left full of water and pressurised, now they've laid the concrete the pressure has gone" ... and added, "it was minus <something brrrr inducing>" at the time. The response was "tell the builder to dig out the floor again, and not to try laying concrete again until it's well above freezing" - or words to that effect.
 
bas wrote
Are there similar numbers in the plumbing forum about wet systems?

Nope. The plumbers know what they are doing.
 
I had stopped in a house with under floor heating in the bath room and it was great. Clearly the guy installing knew what he was doing. So when my mother lost her leg and we wanted to install a wet room we stipulated under floor heating. It was a failure but not all down to it being under floor heating so I will list them for the reader to decide.

*) Original install damaged by builder requiring lift and relay.
*) Idea was floor would dry quickly but once wet from shower it cooled down to much and recovery time too long. Add that sculptured tiles were fitted to give more grip which held the water longer it took 1/2 hour for floor to dry by which time Mum long gone.
*) Set to maximum temperature where one could walk on the tiles without also having a towel rail on the room was cold. The extractor would need changing for heat recovery unit if it was sole heating method.
*) The thermostat only lasted about a year each.
*) When the floor sensor failed it got stuck in the pocket.

I have looked at other systems one local one shown here.
The main point is it was built like that in the first place and not an add on.

There are systems today this is designed to under heat a seat but could be adapted to under floor. The main idea is to store heat so there is a large quantity of stone to heat up. So for a retired couple likely will work well running 24/7. However the idea of only heating the house when home will not work. It needs to be used like storage radiators to work.

Pictures are also links.
 
Wet underfloor, designed, installed and commissioned correctly is fairly maintenance free. Any serviceable parts are all readily accessible.

Electric underfloor heating will fail. The probes are meant to be installed so as to be removeable, but seldom are. The elements themselves will fail eventually too.
 
Electric underfloor heating will fail. The probes are meant to be installed so as to be removeable, but seldom are.
That's an installation error, not an inherent fault.
What I do find strange is that the senders fail - there has to be something fundamentally wrong as a) they are only a resistor, and b) the same type (electrically) of sensor is widely used in industry and I'm not aware that the failure rate is excessive.
The elements themselves will fail eventually too.
Why ? It's only a piece of resistance wire.

Having said that, given the choice I'd go for wet by preference. Higher capacity, and more flexibility in heat source. Downside is that wet is a lot harder to retrofit.
 
Electric underfloor heating will fail. The probes are meant to be installed so as to be removeable, but seldom are. The elements themselves will fail eventually too.
Just for completness, its worth adding that my parents underfloor electric does not have a temperature probe. Its not a overlaid mat type, but cables around 6mm in diameter layed around plastic pulleys nailed to the conrete sub-floor and then concreated over.

I too cannot see they they (or the elements for that matter) should fail, and somewhat this has been proved out by it still going strong after 25years. But then again, im sure the lighter weight mats are susceptable, and ofcause almost anything can potentially fail at some point.

Ultimately that rings true to the 'not very suitable for retro-fitting' which I would said is fairly obvious. Somewhat depends if you after something to take the chill off the floor, or a radiator-free house.


Daniel
 
I have been to the same property several times to swap floor probes and controllers. This same site also now has no UFH in the kitchen or one of the en-suites as the heater mat is now open circuit. Luckily on this site, the probes could be swapped fairly easily.

I have been to other sites to swap probes and been unable to, and have swapped the wall controllers to a type that senses the air temperature instead, at the direction of the manufacturers, and this does not sound quite right to me.

Perhaps I am basing my bad experiences on just one site, but I would certainly not opt for it myself.
 
Perhaps I am basing my bad experiences on just one site, but I would certainly not opt for it myself.
Depends doesnt it, I dont know if I would retro-fit it, but if I was building a new house, or totally renovating somewhere I would certainly be considering it, proberbly in the form of a wet system given that even if your heating with electric there has been a big increase in the availvabily of gshp's since my parents system was installed.
They are not on mains gas, which combined with the big push and cost instentives for electric heating in the 80's made it make perfect sense.


Daniel
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top