Rapist offered role in childs life

Sponsored Links
Yafo said:
You didnt answer the question either, do you ever write or contact yours.
Click to expand...
Right, I take it you didn't then. And we will go around in circles because you're not man enough to answer - I don't need to answer anything because I'm not telling people what to do. Please don't tell people what to do just to point score when you've not done it yourself.

There's a saying for that, it's called 'practice what you preach'. Or there's another I can think of and that's 'don't be a knob'.
 
Sponsored Links
sodthisforfun said:
Right, I take it you didn't then. And we will go around in circles because you're not man enough to answer - I don't need to answer anything because I'm not telling people what to do. Please don't tell people what to do just to point score when you've not done it yourself.

There's a saying for that, it's called 'practice what you preach'. Or there's another I can think of and that's 'don't be a knob'.
Click to expand...
Way to go bro!
 
sodthisforfun said:
...I'm not telling people what to do. Please don't tell people what to do...
Click to expand...
Is there much difference between telling people what to do, and telling them what not to do?
I'm not asking for a discussion on the semantics of words, it's just a question of hypocrisy.
 
I have no problem with taking rights away from prisoners. Unfortunately, the European Court of Human Rights ruled this was unlawful.
They have a mountain to climb on this.
 
motorbiking said:
I have no problem with taking rights away from prisoners. Unfortunately, the European Court of Human Rights ruled this was unlawful.
They have a mountain to climb on this.
Click to expand...
A bit of an exaggeration there.
The ECHR ruled that UK were wrong to pose a blanket ban on prisoners voting.
One has to climb the mountain of exaggeration.
 
Doppleganger said:
Is there much difference between telling people what to do, and telling them what not to do?
I'm not asking for a discussion on the semantics of words, it's just a question of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
I think you'd best have a word with Yafo on hypocrisy.
 
Doppleganger said:
It was an open question to the forum, not to any individual.
Click to expand...
And that's why you highlighted my post yeah? As a general question to everyone? Ha ha ha ha.

Oh himmy himmy, how we've missed you. How you feeling now with the Mods and 'you never been so offended' (over nothing?). I take it all is forgiven now as you're sticking around again. Feeling ok?
 
The issue that the individual has to overcome, is not about prisoners having the right to vote, its specific to their rights in Article 6. If we are to remove rights for convicted criminals, no matter how well justified we ought to be clear about why and how as well as why not.

I am curious as to why a person would join a DIY discussion forum and in 50+ posts, not actually post anything related to DIY?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links

Similar threads

S
Help with child care situation
3 4 5
Replies
68
Views
4K
sxturbo
S
D
  • Locked
another pathetic parole/release decision
Replies
4
Views
513
Notch7
N
N
Hey, Slogger...this you?
Replies
8
Views
629
semi-acoustic
S
HOGGY952
The Erection of Life
Replies
4
Views
951
conny
C
B
judge this barmpot
2 3
Replies
32
Views
3K
billyo
B
Back
Top