Trump is suing the BBC for Ten Billion USD.

Selective facts. That was during lockdown, when they suspended home visits. You probably know this, and are spinning things to try and prove a lie.

The extortion racket is all up and running again now. Threats, court appearances, fines, imprisonment. The most bonkers, ridiculous subscription service in the world. Other countries look at it with disbelief.
 
Helical scan was invented in the 50’s.
I first used Omega Wrap on video recorders late 70’s.
Aye. Video tape was already widespread, obviously.

It was a demo of a prototype consumer digital audio system. It looked like an early stage of DCC, which later failed commercially.

The point was that you could get more info (higher quality) onto the same tape as was already used by spinning the head.

I was giving an example of the sort of in-depth stuff you used to get on the BBC at prime time, not trying to have a war about when stuff was invented.

Also the Money Programme was good. In-depth looks into various UK businesses. Inspiring stuff, could educate people into seeing how business works and perhaps the odd one would start the next massive company.

I don't watch the BBC but I hear the TV highlights on the radio and see the odd clip on YouTube, it looks desperately idiotic.
 
There's plenty of dirt all round. Tice has demanded they look into Labour's links with China, which will probably be enough for Labour to kick it into the long grass along with that other enquiry they've been desperately trying to forget about.
2 wrongs make a right?

Ok

I prefer to see any and all politicians held to account. Regardless of what party, colour, race, age, sex they are

No ifs, no buts
 
There's a lot of it!

You'd hope that someone somewhere would have produced an article including the two sentences that the BBC used as their parts bin, and the sentence they reassembled the words into.

I've seen it in the form of a video, I concluded that they had changed the meaning of his words by editing. Deliberately too, any apprentice editor would have understood this.
 
2 wrongs make a right?

Ok

I prefer to see any and all politicians held to account. Regardless of what party, colour, race, age, sex they are

No ifs, no buts
I can't understand what point you're trying to make (again).

Statement of the obvious?

What 2 wrongs?

I'm just pointing out that they all have skeletons, so whatever's being enquired into will probably be delayed and quietly buried. Not good, not bad, but just the reality of what happens when the referees all play for one of the teams.
 
Back
Top