Laughably incorrect.Plus look at all the grooming gangs. 99.9% of them are not Christian....
Laughably incorrect.Plus look at all the grooming gangs. 99.9% of them are not Christian....
Wrong.Yes, but, 99.9% of grooming gangs have islamic members.

Isn't that the job for all of us?We could say that the problem arises when religion doesn't protect the people.
But it does. It just protects th offenders, not the victims.
Exactly why we don't want other countries criminals. I'm bewildered why you and so many other do enjoy foreign criminals and defend their rights by arguing the toss.Of course, criminals exist in all corners of society. And no society, community or social circle is immune to such criminals.
When it comes from a particular demographic that consists of Co workers, friends, uncles, aunties, cousins, Mums & Dads. The there definitely is a cultural problem.Nor ethnicity. It's simply exploitation of the weaker or gullible by the stronger or more devious.
That's how and why criminals do and can operate.
I did add the word generally.It's not 100% male offenders at all.
Hello (American accent please) King Billy talking facts. Helllo!If you can't deal in facts, don't try to fake it.
It looks more like fake news or bigotry-driven "facts" pulled from the ether.

Made up noseallMade up nonsense.

Laughably noseallLaughably incorrect.

Wrong noseallWrong.

To protect the vulnerable or the criminals?Isn't that the job for all of us?
That's the idea of assessing asylum seekers.Exactly why we don't want other countries criminals.
Ridiculous strawman argument.I'm bewildered why you and so many other do enjoy foreign criminals and defend their rights by arguing the toss.
All religions comprise that form of demographic.When it comes from a particular demographic that consists of Co workers, friends, uncles, aunties, cousins, Mums & Dads. The there definitely is a cultural problem.
100% is 100%, not a lesser percentage. Any qualifying comment after 100% is superfluous and irrelevant.I did add the word generally.
Pick one that you disagree with and we'll discuss it.Hello (American accent please) King Billy talking facts. Helllo!

I would protect the vulnerable.... You the later.To protect the vulnerable or the criminals?
Yes it isThat's the idea of assessing asylum seekers.![]()
Not even Notch would agree with you on this.Ridiculous strawman argument.
You can't sensibly discuss the real issues, so you invent one that you can address.![]()
Im talking Muslim rape gangs. As you know.All religions comprise that form of demographic.
You are generally right on this!
100% is 100%, not a lesser percentage. Any qualifying comment after 100% is superfluous and irrelevant.![]()
You either have a lid on the ashtray or you smoke a bong.Pick one that you disagree with and we'll discuss it.
But some nebulous reference to inaccurate information is as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike.
Be specific.

On what do you base your accusation?I would protect the vulnerable.... You the later.
Glad we agree.Yes it is
I don't think an intelligent discussion depends on what Notch might or might not agree on.Not even Notch would agree with you on this.
Because your bigotry refuses to allow you to see the truth.Im talking Muslim rape gangs. As you know.
I am precisely right on this.You are generally right on this!
I can believe that you would modify a motorbike to allow you to smoke drugs while motoring.You either have a lid on the ashtray or you smoke a bong.