Filth....pure and simple

We could say that the problem arises when religion doesn't protect the people.
But it does. It just protects th offenders, not the victims.
Isn't that the job for all of us?
Of course, criminals exist in all corners of society. And no society, community or social circle is immune to such criminals.
Exactly why we don't want other countries criminals. I'm bewildered why you and so many other do enjoy foreign criminals and defend their rights by arguing the toss.
Nor ethnicity. It's simply exploitation of the weaker or gullible by the stronger or more devious.
That's how and why criminals do and can operate.
When it comes from a particular demographic that consists of Co workers, friends, uncles, aunties, cousins, Mums & Dads. The there definitely is a cultural problem.

It's not 100% male offenders at all.
I did add the word generally.
If you can't deal in facts, don't try to fake it. :rolleyes:
It looks more like fake news or bigotry-driven "facts" pulled from the ether.
Hello (American accent please) King Billy talking facts. Helllo!
 
Isn't that the job for all of us?
To protect the vulnerable or the criminals?

Exactly why we don't want other countries criminals.
That's the idea of assessing asylum seekers. :rolleyes:

I'm bewildered why you and so many other do enjoy foreign criminals and defend their rights by arguing the toss.
Ridiculous strawman argument.
You can't sensibly discuss the real issues, so you invent one that you can address. :rolleyes:

When it comes from a particular demographic that consists of Co workers, friends, uncles, aunties, cousins, Mums & Dads. The there definitely is a cultural problem.
All religions comprise that form of demographic. :rolleyes:

I did add the word generally.
100% is 100%, not a lesser percentage. Any qualifying comment after 100% is superfluous and irrelevant.:rolleyes:

Hello (American accent please) King Billy talking facts. Helllo!
Pick one that you disagree with and we'll discuss it.
But some nebulous reference to inaccurate information is as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike.
Be specific.
 
To protect the vulnerable or the criminals?
I would protect the vulnerable.... You the later.
That's the idea of assessing asylum seekers. :rolleyes:
Yes it is
Ridiculous strawman argument.
You can't sensibly discuss the real issues, so you invent one that you can address. :rolleyes:
Not even Notch would agree with you on this.
All religions comprise that form of demographic.
Im talking Muslim rape gangs. As you know.
:rolleyes:


100% is 100%, not a lesser percentage. Any qualifying comment after 100% is superfluous and irrelevant.:rolleyes:
You are generally right on this!
Pick one that you disagree with and we'll discuss it.
But some nebulous reference to inaccurate information is as useless as an ashtray on a motorbike.
Be specific.
You either have a lid on the ashtray or you smoke a bong.
 
Back
Top