A TV film you haven't seen (Israel's extermination of Palestinian healthcare)

[Kraven]

B******s did they, they used UN resolution 181, the Arabs were offered the same deal but turned it down.

Rubbish.

UNGA resolution 181 simply did not partition Palestine.
It was in fact, a partition plan, which was to be seen as a recommendation, and that the issue should be transferred to the Security Council- which couldn't find a consensus based on UN resolution.

So the Zionist practically enforced their will and took Palestine land.

Actually both the UN and Security council didn't have any jurisdiction to impose political solutions.

Israel was established through warfare and the creation of facts on the ground.

Facts it created through the massacre of Palestinians and the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of villages!!

B******s did they, they used UN resolution 181, the Arabs were offered the same deal but turned it down.

Not true at all.

 

[Odds]

More than 75,000 people were killed in the first 16 months of the two-year war in Gaza, at least 25,000 more than the death toll announced by local authorities at the time, according to a study published on Wednesday in the Lancet medical journal. The research also found that reporting by the Gaza health ministry about the proportion of women, children and elderly people among those killed was accurate.

A total of 42,200 women, children and elderly people died between 7 October 2023, when Hamas launched a surprise attack into Israel that prompted a devastating Israeli offensive into Gaza, and 5 January 2025, the study found. These deaths comprised 56% of violent deaths in Gaza.

“The combined evidence suggests that, as of 5 January 2025, 3-4% of the population of the Gaza Strip had been killed violently and there have been a substantial number of non-violent deaths caused indirectly by the conflict,” the authors of the study, a team including an economist, demographer, epidemiologist and survey specialists, wrote in the Lancet Global Health.

 

[Munroast]

Iran managed about 30,000 in a few weeks - you don't seem bothered about that. Why ? no jews involved ?

 

[King Billy]

Iran managed about 30,000 in a few weeks - you don't seem bothered about that. Why ? no jews involved ?

That would be off-topic.
Did you not see the title of the thread?
Or did you ignore it?

 

[Munroast]

That would be off-topic.
Did you not see the title of the thread?
Or did you ignore it?

an inconvenient fact ?

 

[Odds]

Iran managed about 30,000 in a few weeks - you don't seem bothered about that. Why ? no jews involved ?

The point of my post in this thread is to show the lies told by Israel at the time which have been exposed.
If Iran has lied about the death toll and downplayed the death toll, i'll post that too....

...and it's no use trying to use the 'anti-semitism' card @motorbiking . You've overplayed your hand.

 

[King Billy]

an inconvenient fact ?

Just a fact.
It's inconvenient that you ignored it.

 

[JohnD]

Iran managed about 30,000 in a few weeks - you don't seem bothered about that. Why ? no jews involved ?

I think Munroast should start a thread about other wars that bother him.

I promise not to try to find diversions or excuses for the slaughter in his thread.

But will he do the same for slaughter by Israel?

 

[Mottie]

I think Munroast should start a thread about other wars that bother him.

You have said you will continue to call out anything you believe is connected with genocide. I think he’s waiting for you to start some alleged genocide thread where a Jew isn’t involved. We all are. I think we'll still be waiting this time next year.

 

[JP_]

You have said you will continue to call out anything you believe is connected with genocide. I think he’s waiting for you to start some alleged genocide thread where a Jew isn’t involved. We all are. I think we'll still be waiting this time next year.

The crusades is worth mentioning, mostly because it is the biggest atrocity that we were involved in. European medieval war against muslims in the "holy land". An estimaged 1-3 million muslim civilians killed in around 200 years of mindless bloodshed. Onward Christian solidiers!

In fact, during the Siege of Jerusalem (1099), the crusading forces committed massacres that targeted Muslims, Jews and local Christians. Historical accounts (including those from the Cairo Geniza) note that the Jewish defenders of Jerusalem fought side-by-side with Muslim defenders and were subsequently massacred or burned alive in their synagogues when the city fell.

We were once a common enemy to Jews and Muslimes. Divide and conquer.

Deus vult!

Crusade	Estimated Deaths (Modern Scholarship)
First Crusade	200,000 – 300,000
Second & Third	100,000 – 250,000 each
Albigensian (Europe)	200,000 – 1,000,000 (Varies wildly)
Total (1095–1291)	1,000,000 – 3,000,000

Ultimately, while the raw numbers might be lower than 6 million, the proportional impact on the world's population at the time was enormous—making it one of the deadliest periods in medieval history.

Casualties and the Number of Knights on the First Crusade
Jonathan Riley-Smith
Pages 13-28 | Published online: 17 Feb 2023

• Cite this article
• https://doi.org/10.1080/28327861.2002.12220530

 

[John Smith Esq.]

Reminds me of the time a muslim asylum seeker took a bomb to a maternity unit in Liverpool a few years ago. Thankfully, the actions of the taxi driver prevented women, babies and others being murdered here in our own country. The taxi driver escaped as well, with the lunatic blowing himself up inside the cab.

But let's not concern ourselves with what is going on in our own country. There are more important concerns, thousands of miles away, in crapholes we've never been to...

 

[JP_]

in crapholes we've never been to...

Most of the discussions are about places that we heavily interfered with. And our involvement is related to the attacks on us on our soil.

 

[JohnD]

I think Munroast should start a thread about other wars that bother him.

I promise not to try to find diversions or excuses for the slaughter in his thread.

But will he do the same for slaughter by Israel?

Haa he done it yet?

Perhaps he is not really concerned at all.

 

[JohnD]

crapholes we've never been to...

Do you mean Greenland?

There are very few parts of the world that the British, and prior to that the English and Scots, did not invade or fight.

Obviously you don't mean Africa, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Americas, the Caribbean, China, Malaya, Ireland or the Middle East.

 

[Brigadier]

Do you mean Greenland?

There are very few parts of the world that the British, and prior to that the English and Scots, did not invade or fight.

Obviously you don't mean Africa, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Americas, the Caribbean, China, Malaya, Ireland or the Middle East.

Esq is so confident of their own position, while also being so evidently ignorant of the facts that demolish it.