Another racist, sexist, misogynistic, ageist Labour MP is outed.

[Mottie]

What was your point?

My point was that any politician can be a **** but if you dare point a Labour one out on here, you rarely get any remainers saying "Yes, he is a ****” but you do get lots of 'Tories are/could be/would be/have been worse' posts as has subsequently been proven.

 

[Brigadier]

My point was that any politician can be a **** but if you dare point a Labour one out on here, you rarely get any remainers saying "Yes, he is a ****” but you do get lots of 'Tories are/could be/would be/have been worse' posts as has subsequently been proven.

What's your problem with people pointing out the truth?

And, despite the number of times you keep trying to pretend otherwise, "the lefties" usually post "treat 'em all equally".

 

[transam]

What exactly did this MP say than that has got every one so up set

 

[noseall]

[QUOTE="Mottie, post: 5926056, ]Tory equivalence
[/QUOTE]
Tory equivalence? He'd have been promoted or given a top job, innit.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

[QUOTE="Mottie, post: 5926056, ]Tory equivalence

Tory equivalence? He'd have been promoted or given a top job, innit.
[/QUOTE]

That’s what happens when you edit a post….

 

[carmanmemoranda]

My point was that any politician can be a **** but if you dare point a Labour one out on here, you rarely get any remainers saying "Yes, he is a ****” but you do get lots of 'Tories are/could be/would be/have been worse' posts as has subsequently been proven.

But you got lots of people saying well done. He acted fast and correctly.

Now if you could show any time when the Tories did ?

 

[Lirefighter]

What exactly did this MP say than that has got every one so up set

 

[MNW67]

It's actually very funny!

 

[carmanmemoranda]

View attachment 372377

Correct to be removed then.

I haven't seen anybody defend him. I certainly wouldn't

 

[noseall]

.

 

[noseall]

It’s almost as if Labour have it in for pensioners.

 

[MNW67]

Correct to be removed then.

I haven't seen anybody defend him. I certainly wouldn't

He didn't actually send it to the constituent. It was meant as an in-joke on a Labour party Whatsapp forum.

 

[festive]

What was the sexist remark he made about our Ange, and Abacus?

Oh this is so funny, indeed go on Starmer this another result of Tory rule for too long. No your ragtag amateur gang are already becoming complacent.

I can't help but feel though this is the general sentiment of Labour, none of them seem qualified or of higher disciplined education to run our country, they all seem to be from the back benches of parish councils at best, and we all know how fekin corrupt and amateur they are. I'm not surprised one bit he behaves like this, typical Labour under the covers. So many fking mugs on here voted for these losers. You losers.

 

[MNW67]

What was the sexist remark he made about our Ange, and Abacus?

Oh this is so funny, indeed go on Starmer this another result of Tory rule for too long. No your ragtag amateur gang are already becoming complacent.

I can't help but feel though this is the general sentiment of Labour, none of them seem qualified or of higher disciplined education to run our country, they all seem to be from the back benches of parish councils at best, and we all know how fekin corrupt and amateur they are. I'm not surprised one bit he behaves like this, typical Labour under the covers. So many fking mugs on here voted for these losers. You losers.

Deep breaths!

 

[blup]

They are holding back, there is bound to be other stuff that will finish him, and the other labor twots who went along with it. He sounds like an arrogant bar steward. Meanwhile all pensioners in for a big rise