I purchased a derelict end terrace to rent out rooms. There are 4 rooms being used as bedrooms so it falls under normal domestic regs.
Before starting the project I rang local council, told them what I was doing and asked if I needed any regs. They said I didn't need regs but recommended a meeting with environmental health which I've fully complied with. They also asked if I was doing any major alterations, I said no.
With project nearer completion, I decided ide like to put a 1 metre Worktop in each room. Called council to check that wouldn't require any fire regs and they said they'de send out an inspector.
He arrived and said I needed regs from the start and should have applied. He's happy with what's been done but he wants me to apply for building regs retrospectively and approve them.
Alarm bells rang when he said there is no specific fee listed for what I'de be applying for and also when he started asking me about what sound and fire protection was in ceiling and I had read elsewhere that a standard house didn't require sound or fire protection in the ceiling. When I said this he said that although it wasn't a requirement and he wouldn't be testing levels of sound and fire protection - he still wants to see it. But I couldn't find any example of what level it should be up to and if he's not testing it for its sound and fire properties then how is this 'law' or 'reg' written?
Apparently I should have informed regs and applied for :
altering the thermal properties of the building (I removed plaster, studded, batoned, 25mm PIR and boarded external walls, d&d internal)
Did a complete rewire
Put up 2 stud walls
Changes he's made are that I've got to pay a fee, I've got to put a wired heat&smoke in the kitchen (there were 4 smokes in the hallways) 30 min fire doors and frames all around, double acoustic board and lag ceilings. He also said he'd like to see a partition between the toilet and the bath, but he did say that this wasn't a requirement.
I can't find any of this online, if it was being changed to 2 flats or a new build then yes....but this is purely being used as a normal domestic house. Is this all normal?
In future I could get round all this by doing no updates to a property and leaving it as it was built. It's really annoying me paying for application & inspection that we're never done...
Thanks
Before starting the project I rang local council, told them what I was doing and asked if I needed any regs. They said I didn't need regs but recommended a meeting with environmental health which I've fully complied with. They also asked if I was doing any major alterations, I said no.
With project nearer completion, I decided ide like to put a 1 metre Worktop in each room. Called council to check that wouldn't require any fire regs and they said they'de send out an inspector.
He arrived and said I needed regs from the start and should have applied. He's happy with what's been done but he wants me to apply for building regs retrospectively and approve them.
Alarm bells rang when he said there is no specific fee listed for what I'de be applying for and also when he started asking me about what sound and fire protection was in ceiling and I had read elsewhere that a standard house didn't require sound or fire protection in the ceiling. When I said this he said that although it wasn't a requirement and he wouldn't be testing levels of sound and fire protection - he still wants to see it. But I couldn't find any example of what level it should be up to and if he's not testing it for its sound and fire properties then how is this 'law' or 'reg' written?
Apparently I should have informed regs and applied for :
altering the thermal properties of the building (I removed plaster, studded, batoned, 25mm PIR and boarded external walls, d&d internal)
Did a complete rewire
Put up 2 stud walls
Changes he's made are that I've got to pay a fee, I've got to put a wired heat&smoke in the kitchen (there were 4 smokes in the hallways) 30 min fire doors and frames all around, double acoustic board and lag ceilings. He also said he'd like to see a partition between the toilet and the bath, but he did say that this wasn't a requirement.
I can't find any of this online, if it was being changed to 2 flats or a new build then yes....but this is purely being used as a normal domestic house. Is this all normal?
In future I could get round all this by doing no updates to a property and leaving it as it was built. It's really annoying me paying for application & inspection that we're never done...
Thanks