Bus driver sacked OMG

[pete01]

You're asking a bit much of him there, i think.

Pick on me time again is it? Bring it on ya prized pràt

 

[Highway Man]

Irrelevant.

Nope.


What if I chase them as they run off?
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.

Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)

That rules you and HWM out.

You will never learn. Stop trying to be a solicitor. OMG you are showing yourself right up. The law is perfectly clear(ish) on this,

 

[noseall]

And he did have a duty of care to everybody else on the bus, which he abandoned when he set off in pursuit of the robber

Nuff said.

 

[Highway Man]

Whats he blathering on about?

He is complaining that you are trying to take credit for my amazing copyrighted phrases.

 

[motorbiking]

Irrelevant.

Nope.


What if I chase them as they run off?
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.

Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)

That rules you and HWM out.

We got there finally! a source. Shame it’s the wrong law.. dummy

 

[noseall]

You will never learn. Stop trying to be a solicitor. OMG you are showing yourself right up. The law is perfectly clear(ish) on this,

Yes, as I have just posted with an excerpt from the Crown Prosecution Service guidance paper on it. Chicken biker asked for source, and now he can smother it on his humble pie.

 

[Highway Man]

Irrelevant.

Nope.


What if I chase them as they run off?
This situation is different as you are no longer acting in self-defence and so the same degree of force may not be reasonable. However, you are still allowed to use reasonable force to recover your property and make a citizen's arrest. You should consider your own safety and, for example, whether the police have been called. A rugby tackle or a single blow would probably be reasonable. Acting out of malice and revenge with the intent of inflicting punishment through injury or death would not.

Chasing a fleeing suspect with a weapon and subsequently using it is highly likely to be considered malice, revenge, or retaliation rather than self-defence in legal terms, particularly if the initial threat has passed.
(Source - CPS)

That rules you and HWM out.

titter

 

[noseall]

We got there finally! a source. Shame it’s the wrong law.. dummy

The use of reasonable force is not a law dummy but is referred to and relevant in many laws dummy...

​

https://caringforcare.co.uk/reasonable-force/
Read and weep dummy.

 

[Odds]

Yes, as I have just posted with an excerpt from the Crown Prosecution Service guidance paper on it. Chicken biker asked for source, and now he can smother it on his humble pie.

18 pages - this one has potential...

 

[pete01]

He is complaining that you are trying to take credit for my amazing copyrighted phrases.

Oh

 

[motorbiking]

titter

The use of reasonable force is not a law dummy but is referred to and relevant in many laws dummy...

​

https://caringforcare.co.uk/reasonable-force/
Read and weep dummy.

That’s where I thought you’d got it from.

Relevant. Nope.

 

[pete01]

18 pages - this one has potential...

Good ennit? Unlike your 50 page threads with just yourself commenting

 

[Odds]

That’s where I thought you’d got it from.

Relevant. Nope.

then why don't you just clarify the point of contention in plain English.

 

[Highway Man]

then why don't you just clarify the point of contention in plain English.

way too much fun watching you loonies try to work it out. Running around in circles like headless chickens. This is great.

 

[noseall]

That’s where I thought you’d got it from.

Where I got what from? The CPS report or the chart describing the applications of reasonable force?

Relevant. Nope.

The rules and laws surrounding and referring to reasonable force are not relevant to a person chasing a subject with a weapon? Explain?