Apologies to all for my careless wording. I should have said either:Careful_Bodger said:Hi B-A-S,
You said 'Equipotential bonding doesn't have to go back to the CU.' (17/12/04)
Can you expand on this a bit? I thought that this was the whole point about (Mains) Equipotential Bonding? (as opposed to Supp Bonding)
...and why shouldn't it be 'under the floor'? Is there a Reg?
Thanks!
"Supplementary bonding doesn't have to go back to the CU"
or
"Supplementary equipotential bonding doesn't have to go back to the CU"