Chelsea! Chelsea!

Sponsored Links
You lose all credibility when you use the BBC as a news source :rolleyes:
The BBC is a reliable source.

can you provide evidence it is not?

of course you hate the BBC, because your Tory masters told you to.
 
So if you believed that bbc coverage was incorrect and not right wing enough. Who was your chosen trusted news source that you chose in the end? :ROFLMAO:
I can’t wait for for this reply!
Express, mail, both?
Are you a plumber? ….it’s just that the vast majority of plumbers are Brexit voting Tory supporters.

Weirdly electricians seem more likely to be anti Brexit.
 
Sponsored Links
They employed serial liar John Sweeney and corpse shaggerJimmy SoVile.
What more proof do you want.
“They”? Rather tenuous link to the BBC new team don’t you think. Pretty sure that what the BBC news and the rest of the UK’s more honest news teams report are fairly similar. If you think having a one time criminal in your ranks somehow renders a whole institution dishonest then you may as well write off all news articles you observe.

Silly vinty.
 
Are you a plumber? ….it’s just that the vast majority of plumbers are Brexit voting Tory supporters.

Weirdly electricians seem more likely to be anti Brexit.
That’s interesting! We’ll tge leavers are certainly more vocal in the combustion chamber but there was a poll and most were pro Brexit around the leave campaign
 
If people listened to what was said the program was based on a report and it was stated that they could not verify it. The strange method Russia used to privatise companies may have related to getting shut of communist control. One view which might be more correct than the general one

A "less cynical" interpretation was proposed by Professor of political science and international studies, Russell Bova, who offered as an alternative, that Chubais may have been motivated by concerns that privatization would fail, that in the face of mid-1990s economic difficulty, the country might revert towards a Communist resurgence if progress was not maintained, and that in light of these concerns, the long term political goals of democratization and asset distribution from state hands to private ownership might have been deemed more important than possible short term gains from the asset sales: "f that meant undervaluing State assets then so be it".[7]

A Russian just like all can only buy things via the money they can raise. Perhaps he was the right guy for the job. When the USSR collapsed crime elements fought on the streets. Something Russians were not used to. Over time the gangs consolidated forming what is seen as a mafia with international ties with similar elsewhere. Who knows maybe some of the things that happened were to prevent them owning assets. They might also relate to some of the more extreme aspects.

A bit from his wiki page - worth a read
In early July 2008, it was announced that President Dmitry Medvedev had accepted Abramovich's request to resign as governor of Chukotka, although his various charitable activities in the region would continue. In the period 2000–2006 the average salaries in Chukotka increased from about US$165 (€117/£100) per month in 2000 to US$826 (€588/£500) per month in 2006
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Abramovich

Bribes to political aspects are a rather extreme example of donating to political parties in a rather strange country. The UK isn't adverse to them - remember the noise about a bribe to secure an arms deal. Also political sleaze here and elsewhere.

Ukraine EU and probably NATO - are these a problem?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_oligarch#List_of_oligarchs_by_wealth
 
I'm sure the oligarchs all became multi-billionaires through perfectly legitimate business practices ;) regardless of who's reporting what now.

OT but as for fans chanting Abramovich's name during matches ... what a bunch of idiots on SO many levels.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top