Chopes, how disrespectful

[JohnD]

Called up-kilting in Scotland

yes, and some people think that's why the kilt-wearing men made it illegal while the trousered men of Westminster didn't bother.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

How does this bill protect anyone ?

God forbid some horn hound in second school wants to look at some fanny. As most lads that age think about nothing else...

How many people exactly go around filming up women's skirts ?

Your usual left wing virtue signalling. I wouldn't be surprised if you try and argue that there are less perverts in the labour party versus conservatives...

Again, if this was a labour mp you wouldn't be posting it.

Oh God, it looks like hawkeye is disappointed with the impending introduction of legislation to outlaw upskirting.

To deal with your points in turn: The bill does not protect anyone, but it does bring in severe penalties for anyone caught breaking that law. That law would cover existing gaps in other laws.

Are you suggesting that under-age school children (boys and girls) should be excused or excluded from the offence of upskirting/voyerism etc.? The mind boggles, especially in relation to the potential age of the victims!

Does it matter how many people go around upskirting, FFS! One deviant could obscenely offend hundreds or thousands of females! Your question should have been phrased as "how many females are victims?"

It is not a political party issue!
But you cannot be expected to understand such issues.

 

[Brigadier]

Has anyone here actually seen the text of the proposed Bill?

 

[JohnD]

yes, of course. Anybody who is interested or cares has seen it.

I presume you haven't.

 

[Brigadier]

Ok.

Really?

Correct.

 

[Ian H]

I haven't but I did google 'Upskirt'.

For research.

 

[JohnD]

Correct.

Something you have in common with Chope when he objected to a bill he hadn't read.

 

[Brigadier]

From what was said in PMQs, sounds like he was correct to do so.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Why would he have needed to read it?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Maybe Chope has shares in the Sunday Sport.
Or the companies who make the kneepads that paps use to get upskirt photos of z-list bimbos getting out of cars.

Called up-kilting in Scotland...FFS

 

[JohnD]

Maybe Chope has shares in the Sunday Sport.
Or the companies who make the kneepads that paps use to get upskirt photos of z-list bimbos getting out of cars.

He's just a daft old buffer whose hobby is being obstructive. He thinks that Parliament is a place for his pranks.

He's trying to portray himself as a victim now, just because the latest of his silly escapades has attracted more public opprobrium than usual.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

He's just a daft old buffer whose hobby is being obstructive.

I wish he'd obstruct the democracy-destroying Brexit legislation.

 

[JohnD]

he's very much in favour of that, and against it being debated.

(there are a few people who believe the false story that he is in principle a supporter of bills being thoroughly debated)

 

[EFLImpudence]

He's just a daft old buffer whose hobby is being obstructive.

So, it would seem that you, in common with Chope, object to the procedures involved, yet only he is a "daft old buffer".

He's trying to portray himself as a victim now, just because the latest of his silly escapades has attracted more public opprobrium than usual.

That is indeed an odd view.
That some stupid woman has believed the hype, which you appear also to believe, and strung knickers across his door is a sad reflection of the state of the country.

he's very much in favour of that, and against it being debated.
(there are a few people who believe the false story that he is in principle a supporter of bills being thoroughly debated)

You will, of course, have proof of that and be able to give us a link.


Your indignation knows no bounds.

 

[JohnD]

yet only he is a "daft old buffer"

I have never claimed that he is the only daft old buffer in the world.