Can any of you illustrious gentlemen offer me a few words of advise, please ?
I have a '60's detached 3 bedroom house, fitted with a (very old) Majorca Glow-Worm gas fire + back boiler. It's kept on going, and heats the house sufficiently, so I haven't needed to replace it. I now want to put a flashy flame effect fire in the room, and have seen the way the fuel bills are going, and so also want to replace the boiler.
The house now has DG all round, plenty of loft insulation, and cavity wall insulation. The heating system is a conventional fully-pumped open one with 10 rads, HW cylinder stat, room stat and MV. There is a single storey garage adjacent to the kitchen, and the logical place to put the new boiler is in the garage, in effect on the outer wall of the house, and plumb it in through this wall, which takes the pipes under the bathroom floor. Gas is available here, as there is a gas pipe to an office behind the garage. The flue would go up, through the flat roof of the garage, with suitable termination.
The problems of the visible vapours drifting past the landing window, no sensible/easy way of achieving condensate drainage, and the issue of debatable fuel efficiency of condensing boilers under normal day-to-day conditions, plus their higher cost, apparently shorter life span and reduced reliability, lead to the conclusion that a non-condensing boiler would suit me best. I've been looking at the Worcester 14/19CBi, for example.
My intention is to fit the hardware, and arrange for a local gasman to do the gaswork. In my previous house, I designed and installed a complete CH system, and I have re-arranged/replaced some of the radiators and improved the control circuitry on this installation.
I understand that the conditions under which a non-condensing boiler can now be fitted are tight. The question is: is my gut feeling right, and will I get away with it ?
Thanks in advance ..
I have a '60's detached 3 bedroom house, fitted with a (very old) Majorca Glow-Worm gas fire + back boiler. It's kept on going, and heats the house sufficiently, so I haven't needed to replace it. I now want to put a flashy flame effect fire in the room, and have seen the way the fuel bills are going, and so also want to replace the boiler.
The house now has DG all round, plenty of loft insulation, and cavity wall insulation. The heating system is a conventional fully-pumped open one with 10 rads, HW cylinder stat, room stat and MV. There is a single storey garage adjacent to the kitchen, and the logical place to put the new boiler is in the garage, in effect on the outer wall of the house, and plumb it in through this wall, which takes the pipes under the bathroom floor. Gas is available here, as there is a gas pipe to an office behind the garage. The flue would go up, through the flat roof of the garage, with suitable termination.
The problems of the visible vapours drifting past the landing window, no sensible/easy way of achieving condensate drainage, and the issue of debatable fuel efficiency of condensing boilers under normal day-to-day conditions, plus their higher cost, apparently shorter life span and reduced reliability, lead to the conclusion that a non-condensing boiler would suit me best. I've been looking at the Worcester 14/19CBi, for example.
My intention is to fit the hardware, and arrange for a local gasman to do the gaswork. In my previous house, I designed and installed a complete CH system, and I have re-arranged/replaced some of the radiators and improved the control circuitry on this installation.
I understand that the conditions under which a non-condensing boiler can now be fitted are tight. The question is: is my gut feeling right, and will I get away with it ?
Thanks in advance ..