European Elections

[RogueHanger]

Why is Rouge concerned with UKIP,he needs to look inward with Le Pen and Front National an anti immigrant party I believe.

Because he actually lives in Staffordshire.. Might be a big bearing on why he's so concerned about Ukip.

Silly boy. It is why I am concerned with my personal data being out of date.
Certainly I used to commute between Staffordshire and France. But now I'm mostly fulltime in France. But I still visit UK regularly and I take an interest in national and local politics in both countries.

Your assumptions are as useful as your contributions.
Probably explains why you have a distorted view of reality.

 

[RogueHanger]

You're testing my patience again.
You're too lazy to read previous posts which I've explained to you before. Your laziness causes you to embarrass yourself, and tries my patience.

I'll try to explain myself, yet again. After that I'll give up.

I've not checked the figures, I accepted your values as reliable... you said "With a 43% tun out and a 27% UKIP support, that means that less than 12% of UK support for UKIP. (Typical parliamentary elections achieve greater than 60% tunout)"

So, even with my rudimentary grasp of figures, this tells me that of the 43% of people who voted, 27% of those voted for UKIP, and, in my opinion it is not possible to draw further conclusions re UKIP support, I even provided you with an example as to how any conclusions could be flawed.

Could you highlight this example for me, because it appears to be lost in the text, somewhere.

I stated that, I was unable to vote but if I had been able to then I would have voted UKIP.

That was your excuse for not voting. It was not an example of your supporting argument for your assertion.

If you'd care to offer a 'yes or no' response to my initial statement that would be great and we need take it no further.

To which question would you like a "yes" or "no" answer?

My suggestion that 27% of voters voted UKIP and there was no further data available to conclude differently.

That is a suggestion, therefore not requiring a "yes" or "no" answer.

Just to be clear, my supportive argument is that you cannot draw further conclusions re. UKIP support as there is no supporting data.

Just to be clear, that is your assertion. There is no supporting argument.

Yes, you provided no supporting argument for the contradictory stats that you offered

Yawn!
Read below:

Of course there is further supporting data, opinion polls of future UKIP supporters intentions, statistics of current election, previous electoral movements, present socio-economic climate, etc.

What you really mean is: you choose not to draw any further conclusions.

You chose to draw further conclusions in the absence of supporting data.

you're running rings around.................yourself.
Why not stop this discussion now before you embarrass yourself any further.
You're certainly not developing your argument, you're just repeating assertions.

 

[CylonRaider]