Evolution of music and the next big thing..

M

Mickymoody

I got into music late '80's, then then '90's it seemed to downhill, with Pete Waterman inspired hits, then picked up again later with Rave, and then nothing inspirational. I like '60's music, I like classical stuff. I like rock of the '80's,

Is there going to be an artist to inspire, going to appear anytime soon, or is it just emulation, like Amy Winehouse, or manufactured pop, like the Monkeys that will continue to regurgitate the same old same old? Bands breaking up, then reforming, is there another genre of music going to happen anytime soon? Anyone at number 1 for weeks on end....or do we have to listen to the same rifts and styles, and modified voices, autotune, or is there a real talent out there?
 
Sponsored Links
No new artists? Do we have to endure the X Factor yet again?

Holy crap! What more rubbish are we endured to listen to?
 
I watched the Jules Holland show last night - what a load of rubbish that was.
 
it's simply an evolution, based on the accepted genres of music.... rock/metal/thrash/emo is quite well defined, whereas pop bounces about a bit and emerges as boy bands, girl bands, bieber, gaga, madonna etc...

if you don't like it, get out there and make some music !!!
 
Sponsored Links
I find it very interesting wondering what music will be like in say, 50 years.

I much prefer music of the 60's and 70's to much of what's released today. Especially the absolute nonsense that appears in the charts. What is with that awful autotune stuff...?
 
I think there are still some good genuine bands and artists out there but there doesn't seem to be any longevity. An X-factor winner, who may or may not be very good is played non stop by all the radio stations until everyone is sick of hearing them. Then they are dropped for the next 'big thing'.

But I have to agree that the majority of chart stuff is carp.

And also whats all this 'ft' thing about? Des O'Connor ft Dizzy Rascal. :D
 
I watched the Jules Holland show last night - what a load of rubbish that was.

I used to watch Jools Holland's Hootenanny until found out that it was recorded in the summer. Don't watch it any more.
 
I doubt we'll ever have another "Bryan Adams" at no.1 in the charts thanks to download sales which just make the charts so unpredictable and 'up and down' Take this week for example, The Goo Goo Dolls released "Iris" in 1998 and it made it to 50 in the UK charts, the re-release in 1999 made it to 26, but its highest chart position was this week, where 12 years after it was released it made it to No.3 - and why? Because two guys sang it on X-factor last week.... Next week it probably wont be in the chart at all...

Don McLean announced that 'music died' in 1959, but, for me, it has since been re-born and died again when pop stars/pop idol/x-factor or whatever the hell came first, appeared on our screens.

The music industry is more about making money than making music these days :(
 
I doubt we'll ever have another "Bryan Adams" at no.1 in the charts thanks to download sales which just make the charts so unpredictable and 'up and down' Take this week for example, The Goo Goo Dolls released "Iris" in 1998 and it made it to 50 in the UK charts, the re-release in 1999 made it to 26, but its highest chart position was this week, where 12 years after it was released it made it to No.3 - and why? Because two guys sang it on X-factor last week.... Next week it probably wont be in the chart at all...

Don McLean announced that 'music died' in 1959, but, for me, it has since been re-born and died again when pop stars/pop idol/x-factor or whatever the hell came first, appeared on our screens.
Don't let nostalgia get in the way of finding good music. There has always been bad pop (SAW coneyor pop, Kadgagoogoo, to name a few). There has also been a lot of good music out there as well over the years. No one forces you to listen to any of the pap.
The music industry is more about making money than making music these days :(
Was it ever thus? When they were making 78s of rural folk music is the US in the 1930s, they weren't doing it for fun.

Today we have a much greater choice of music being produce than any time I can think of. We have more stations, catering for different tastes, and if you hate pop, there are many places to avoid it.

We do certain festivals most years (Beautiful Days, Bearded Theory), and find out about a whole range of music thats out there. I also listen to 6Music, which is fantastic.

I would have loved a station like 6Music when I was a teen, but we had R1 playing pop rubbish, and the decent music only played late at night.

We even have access to internet radio, giving you an even wider range of specialisations.

For me, mid to late 90s was a dry peiod for good music. Then the 00s kicked in, and we suddenly new acts coming in that were fab. Today, I often find it difficult to find new stuff I enjoy, but that's me not having the time to look for it like I used to.

This idea that they are in it for the money is true, but what we have to ask our selves is: Do they offer value for money?, are they doing it for the right reasons?

The X-Factors of this world fall down here of course. What many rock/ folk/ emo acts offer is value, and they are doing it because they love it. We know this, as they don't exactly get a lot of fame or glory from it. The pop acts generally do it for fame and money, and it usually shows. The people behind the scenes of the pop acts are marketers rather than artisically based in creating these acts.

Ultimately, we get the music we deserve. And we get the music we look out for and find. If you don't like what you come acroos, look else where, and you'll eventually find something different that you might like, as there is so much choice these days.
 
Today we have a much greater choice of music being produce than any time I can think of. We have more stations, catering for different tastes, and if you hate pop, there are many places to avoid it.

Ultimately, we get the music we deserve. And we get the music we look out for and find. If you don't like what you come acroos, look else where, and you'll eventually find something different that you might like, as there is so much choice these days.

Agree there wobs.....there is a vast choice available.....at your fingertips really. I still love the 60/70's stuff though, it always amazes me that when I hear a song from that era I can still remember every word and sing along to it. I don't think many modern day songs will be so long lasting.
Hubby recently asked me to look for a certain song by Ringo Starr....once I started searching I was amazed at how many great songs he has recorded .....really enjoying listening to them.
 
This idea that they are in it for the money is true, but what we have to ask our selves is: Do they offer value for money?, are they doing it for the right reasons?

The X-Factors of this world fall down here of course. What many rock/ folk/ emo acts offer is value, and they are doing it because they love it. We know this, as they don't exactly get a lot of fame or glory from it. The pop acts generally do it for fame and money, and it usually shows. The people behind the scenes of the pop acts are marketers rather than artisically based in creating these acts.

This is kinda what I meant, in the past it seems to me that artists and groups played music because they had a talent and enjoyed expressing it and the fact they could make a living (and probably a good living) out of it was a bonus. These days, most people just see it as a way of making a fortune with little effort and very often with little talent.

I also agree that there is still decent stuff out there if you look for it, it just seems to me that the general music the 'masses' listen to these days is poor in relation to the music the 'masses' used to listen to. I think time is the greatest test - even youngsters that weren't born when the likes of The Beatles, The Stones, Beach Boys, Queen, Elton John, Abba had their hits still know and recognise their songs. In 2021 just 10 years down the line, I wonder how many of the artists in yesterday's chart will be remembered by anyone?
 
You know you're getting old when they play your favourite music on Radio 2. :LOL:
 
Ah..Radio 2.......the Radio 1 for people in their 40's!
 
The problem is that music is generally 'of the moment' and only relevant for a brief period in time.

We all grow up with the tunes of our parents, and then 'our music' is that which is around at the times of our teens and early twenties. Then we hang on to 'our music' and berate the new stuff which the new teens love

Good song writing can prevail, as can artists with charisma and character. But there is nothing worse than old bands playing their music from 20-30 years ago, or those bands changing their music to what is current - they can't win either way, and perhaps they should all just f-f-fade away after a while
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top