failing to understand the rules... again.

The same rules that applied to the Tories:
Boris Johnson has admitted receiving a free holiday at a luxurious Spanish villa linked to Zac Goldsmith, the former MP who was given a peerage and job by the prime minister.

:rolleyes:
 
Apparently Kieth should have been on today but is running scared of tv interviews at the moment.
 
She excused herself by saying it wasn't as much as the Tories. Then again, Labour's only been in a few months. Give it time.

The fact that "All MP's do it" is not an acceptable reason. None of them should do it.
 
She excused herself by saying it wasn't as much as the Tories. Then again, Labour's only been in a few months. Give it time.

The fact that "All MP's do it" is not an acceptable reason. None of them should do it.
But it was never a problem when the Tories were doing it. :rolleyes:
 
I believe he might be interviewing a new chief of staff or trying on free clothes. :LOL:
Or maybe he's considering introducing a clothing allowance for MPs, as is normal in other countries.

When one considers that prior to the rise of the Labour party, clothing was easily affordable for the gentry.
Now that many Labour MPs are working class, a clothing allowance would make much more sense than gifts of clothing.
 
Someone on £91,346 + expenses can't afford clothes :rolleyes:
Their refundable expenses are capped. And clothes are not a refundable expense.
E.g. there is an annual cap of about £100,000 for office and staffing costs.
Average salary for one Parliamentary Assistant £31,000.
Usually staffing costs account for about 75% of the allowance.

A director of a large corporation might spend about £3k - £4k per month (about £50k per year) on expenses.
 
An MP is not a director of a large corporation. I highly suspect most couldn't run a stationary cupboard, let alone a large corporation.

Are you seriously suggesting an MP needs the tax payer to subsidise their wardrobe?
 
Back
Top