- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,463
- Reaction score
- 6,107
- Country

I’m not sure a 100-400 is a good choice. Is there not anything less zoomy. Maybe a 300mm prime ?


The range is 200 to 800 in full frame terms.I’m not sure a 100-400 is a good choice. Is there not anything less zoomy. Maybe a 300mm prime ?

Generally speaking. The wider the range of the lens the more compromised the quality.The range is 200 to 800 in full frame terms.

micro four thirds, a lot less materials and much smaller than other lenses. That was one of the reasons I went for itGenerally speaking. The wider the range of the lens the more compromised the quality.
100-400 is a big ask for a lens retailing around a grand.


I will take a look and seeYeah that actually a reason to go for a prime

Yeah that actually a reason to go for a prime


have you a link?That’s f4 so already better, but I’ve seen a few used ones for half that.


yes, it is a good focal length for wildlifeWex and park cameras have a few.
You understand this is a telephoto lens not a zoom lens. It’s 300mm fixed.

Because of the weather being as it is I have been learning all of the features and reading about composition. I bought a few books as suggested and have also bought a book on the actual camera. So can you believe the only photos I have actually taken is all from within in my house!!!!!!so been a while now - how you getting on with the camera and you were buying bits for it- so what have you got now
Because of the weather being as it is I have been learning all of the features and reading about composition. I bought a few books as suggested and have also bought a book on the actual camera. So can you believe the only photos I have actually taken is all from within in my house!!!!!!