

I thought the whole idea of the out campaign was to reduce the number of EU people coming into this country, there was some lesser things as well like having to accept EU laws, but unless this country is able to refuse entry to EU people then the vote becomes pointless, personally I voted stay in, however May say out was out, so following the people of this country she really has no option to restrict people from EU, this would likely only be the right to work here, they would still be able to visit, but you can't on one hand say have to follow the vote (which she does not need to do anyway) and then allow people to work here without any permit.

True, first bit and second bit.The whole leave campaign seemed to be a misconception, and what is being talked about now seems to have no relationship to what we were told before the vote.
However is out is out, then it's as it says out, not out for this bit and in for this bit. We all know what was put to vote has nothing to do with what is being done, except for the politicians who it seems have blinkers on.

In the main no, we all know there should have been a second vote once the facts came to light, except it seems the politicians.True, first bit and second bit.
Second bit, there was a ref, the voice was heard. But as a remainer, I to and fro between respecting democracy and the fact the campaign seems to have been run on make believe from both sides. So did people really truly know what they were voting for?
Not so much believe/not believe, as consider very closely just what those "rights" are which will be "enshrined".It's Hunt. Anyone who believes him needs to lie down.

they aren't the same as the rights which EU citizens currently have