High Court Rules...

[morqthana]

Are you still here.

D you think I should not be on the grounds that people should not be allowed to express opposing views to you?

You post childish drivel.

So, are the images I posted those of people using violence to influence government policy, or not?

 

[fillyboy]

D you think I should not be on the grounds that people should not be allowed to express opposing views to you?

If you're voicing support for a proscribed terrorist group then no, you shouldn't be allowed on here as you would be in breach of section 12 Terrorism Act 2000.

 

[morqthana]

If you're voicing support for a proscribed terrorist group then no, you shouldn't be allowed on here as you would be in breach of section 12 Terrorism Act 2000.

But I'm not, am I.

Nothing here voicing support for any proscribed terrorist group.

 

[King Billy]

If you're voicing support for a proscribed terrorist group then no, you shouldn't be allowed on here as you would be in breach of section 12 Terrorism Act 2000.

But it's OK to call for mass deportation of British subjects to some unknown destination, or propose murdering them on arrival, or support violent racist protests, or to voice support for Israel in its policy of Genocide, or to voice support for fake news perpetrators in calling for serious violence, on here?

 

[Highway Man]

But I'm not, am I.

Nothing here voicing support for any proscribed terrorist group.

But you do have an avatar that is more provocative than others on here.

 

[Dec27]

But you do have an avatar that is more provocative than others on here.

He’s just a dirty low life Troll. Nothing is beneath him to try and get a rise

 

[morqthana]

Chief Justice Sue Carr: under the law proscription would “not prevent public expressions of support for the Palestinian cause or opposition to Israel and to the Israel Defense Forces, or demonstrations targeted at Elbit”.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood: “There is a difference between supporting Palestine and supporting a proscribed terrorist group."

But you do have an avatar that is more provocative than others on here.

 

[Highway Man]

Chief Justice Sue Carr: under the law proscription would “not prevent public expressions of support for the Palestinian cause or opposition to Israel and to the Israel Defense Forces, or demonstrations targeted at Elbit”.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood: “There is a difference between supporting Palestine and supporting a proscribed terrorist group."




View attachment 416754

Using a Palestinian flag as an avatar on social media is legal in the UK, but context matters. Since the UK formally recognizes the State of Palestine, displaying the flag as a general symbol of solidarity, cultural identity, or political advocacy is perfectly lawful and protected as free expression. [1, 2, 3, 4]
However, displaying the flag can carry implications depending on how and where you use it:

 

[Highway Man]

Chief Justice Sue Carr: under the law proscription would “not prevent public expressions of support for the Palestinian cause or opposition to Israel and to the Israel Defense Forces, or demonstrations targeted at Elbit”.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood: “There is a difference between supporting Palestine and supporting a proscribed terrorist group."




View attachment 416754

Do you think it is not provocative or inappropriate to use it on a DIY site? This could easily be considered a misuse of it and a provocative action.

 

[morqthana]

However, displaying the flag can carry implications depending on how and where you use it:

Indeed.

Anthropologist Dominic Bryan, who has researched the use of flags in Northern Ireland for more than 20 years, has commented on the phenomenon in Great Britain that: "We've heard predictable claims that the flags are just a display of pride in a British or English identity. This is an easy claim to make as it clearly is, in part, to do with nationalistic pride. The point is that they are being hung in particular places, by particular groups of people and in a particular way that clearly links them to the ongoing debates and hostility to migration". Historian Camilla Schofield cites Operation Raise the Colours as an example of "the contemporary global ascendancy of ethno-nationalism and the ideological capture of national symbols by fascist groups across the UK". Historian of British fascism Nigel Copsey writes that as Operation Raise the Colours established an online presence, it "prompted copycat efforts... These efforts either took the form of self-identified crews of local ‘flaggers’ or remained more ad-hoc. Whatever, they drew sustenance from the far right."

 

[morqthana]

Do you think it is not provocative or inappropriate to use it on a DIY site? This could easily be considered a misuse of it and a provocative action.

Do you think that something which is

perfectly lawful and protected as free expression. [1, 2, 3, 4]

should be disallowed here if some people decide it's "provocative"?

How is displaying the flag of Palestine "provocative or inappropriate .. on a DIY site" if displaying the flag of Israel is not?

 

[Highway Man]

Do you think that something which is

should be disallowed here if some people decide it's "provocative"?

How is displaying the flag of Palestine "provocative or inappropriate .. on a DIY site" if displaying the flag of Israel is not?

I have no issues with the Palestinian avatar if used as a statement of support for the Palestinian people. In your case you are very politically driven and use it to drive that home therefore it could be perceived as provocative

 

[King Billy]

Do you think that something which is

should be disallowed here if some people decide it's "provocative"?

How is displaying the flag of Palestine "provocative or inappropriate .. on a DIY site" if displaying the flag of Israel is not?

If some people here think it's provocative to fly a flag as a symbol of support for anti-immigration, I'm going to fly a flag of support for the Palestinian people.
And it's as much a symbol of support for the Palestinians, as offer of condolences for those killed by Israel, and a symbol against Israel's conduct during this "act of Genocide".

And if I p1ss them off, well a bit of reciprocation is OK, in my book.

 

[morqthana]

I have no issues with the Palestinian avatar if used as a statement of support for the Palestinian people.

So you've never, with no evidence but only unfounded guesses, suggested that displaying the Palestinian flag is expressing support for terrorists?

In your case you are very politically driven

No more than others here.

and use it to drive that home therefore it could be perceived as provocative

What about using the Israeli flag as an avatar? Is that politically driven?

 

[Highway Man]

So you've never, with no evidence but only unfounded guesses, suggested that displaying the Palestinian flag is expressing support for terrorists?




No more than others here.




What about using the Israeli flag as an avatar? Is that politically driven?

You keep trying to point the finger towards filly constantly so once again showing your real reason for displaying that avatar. Nothing to do with actually supporting the Palestinians in general. More to pizz people off. Thanks for the confirmation