- Joined
- 29 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country

Hi everyone, hope you are all well.
We are in the process of purchasing a property and wondered if I could get some advice on a red flag raised as part of our building survey, just so we know where we stand with the sellers and any initial discussions we need to have with them.
The surveyor has said the following:
"Between the subject property and the left neighbouring property, the lean-to wall is found to have shifted, with the wall detached. We would recommend complete reconstruction where the roof and wall have been compromised. This requires opening up to reconstruct. We would recommend that a structural engineer further examine."
I have attached a photo that the surveyor took which shows part of the side brick wall (left of the property) giving way.
So, I have cycled through the photos and my memory of the house when we went to last visit. I have also attached the floorplan which may help visualise things!
The house has had a number of extensions. To the rear of the main structure (non converted) of the house, there is a rear extension which was a kitchen extension.
To the left of the porch in the above picture there is a two part extension. where the small window is (left of the porch) there is a small shower room which i understand was extended first.
Beyond that a second extension was done which goes the length of the building (to the end of the kitchen extension) effectively covering what would have been an alleyway (labelled the lean to). This is just used as storage. From my memory, this storage space had exposed blockwork on the interior.
So as far as my understanding is correct, there are effectively two parts of the side extension. It looks like the original wall of the house still remains and has been extended alongside the kitchen wall.
So what i think they have done is bricked up the front of the house and maybe up to where the shower room goes to. From the rear of the building they have also bricked the wall but I am guessing from the side of the house they only went so far with the external bricks.
I guess my question if my assumption and understanding is correct, is any of this legal? is it legal to have a part brick/ part blockwork extension (or at least covering the blockwork with brick only to a certain extent?). When we did our second viewing, the owner said that he had all necessary building regs for all the extensions (although we have not yet had sight of this) but could they be misleading us? If legal, does the whole extension still need reconstruction as the surveyor suggests?
Thanks everyone, and appreciate the time taken with the long read but tried to give as much info as possible!
We are in the process of purchasing a property and wondered if I could get some advice on a red flag raised as part of our building survey, just so we know where we stand with the sellers and any initial discussions we need to have with them.
The surveyor has said the following:
"Between the subject property and the left neighbouring property, the lean-to wall is found to have shifted, with the wall detached. We would recommend complete reconstruction where the roof and wall have been compromised. This requires opening up to reconstruct. We would recommend that a structural engineer further examine."
I have attached a photo that the surveyor took which shows part of the side brick wall (left of the property) giving way.
So, I have cycled through the photos and my memory of the house when we went to last visit. I have also attached the floorplan which may help visualise things!
The house has had a number of extensions. To the rear of the main structure (non converted) of the house, there is a rear extension which was a kitchen extension.
To the left of the porch in the above picture there is a two part extension. where the small window is (left of the porch) there is a small shower room which i understand was extended first.
Beyond that a second extension was done which goes the length of the building (to the end of the kitchen extension) effectively covering what would have been an alleyway (labelled the lean to). This is just used as storage. From my memory, this storage space had exposed blockwork on the interior.
So as far as my understanding is correct, there are effectively two parts of the side extension. It looks like the original wall of the house still remains and has been extended alongside the kitchen wall.
So what i think they have done is bricked up the front of the house and maybe up to where the shower room goes to. From the rear of the building they have also bricked the wall but I am guessing from the side of the house they only went so far with the external bricks.
I guess my question if my assumption and understanding is correct, is any of this legal? is it legal to have a part brick/ part blockwork extension (or at least covering the blockwork with brick only to a certain extent?). When we did our second viewing, the owner said that he had all necessary building regs for all the extensions (although we have not yet had sight of this) but could they be misleading us? If legal, does the whole extension still need reconstruction as the surveyor suggests?
Thanks everyone, and appreciate the time taken with the long read but tried to give as much info as possible!
