How to use 'deadly force - and get away with it.

As opposed to biased and leading questions from right wanging commentators.
It is a fact that Blair's government, and every British government after his, brought in unprecedented numbers of foreigners. How could a question be neutrally and reasonably worded to bring you to this fact? (Or to say that it isn't true, for that matter).
 
They're out of control.
You'd think someone might have a word before they go out on a raid. "Don't kill anyone", that sort of thing.
But no!
Shoot first, refuse to answer questions later is their way.
Trump is loving every minute it. The thought of being able to shoot democrat voters dead will be making his head spin.
 
What use is it, if it only tells you what you want to hear?
Its a tool, you need to know how to use it effectively just like any other tool.

If you're doing 'research' then a key point is: don't lead the witness.
 
They're out of control.
You'd think someone might have a word before they go out on a raid. "Don't kill anyone", that sort of thing.
But no!
Shoot first, refuse to answer questions later is their way.

Have you seen the video.

OMG!!

Seven ICE agents are arresting one man. He is struggling, but four agents have him on the ground. And then they shoot him dead.

Apparently, he is a 37 year old US citizen with a carry permit.
 
Get off the glue and move on boyo. Blair? FFS. :rolleyes:
He is the cause of all our woes FFS boyo.

Its a tool, you need to know how to use it effectively just like any other tool.

If you're doing 'research' then a key point is: don't lead the witness.
I typed "Replacement of the British population by Tony Blair". How is that leading the witness?
 
Surely, being illegal immigrants, each and every one of them has committed a crime already so the figure of crimes committed by illegal immigrants is already at 100%?
Mottie, you are dealing with the loony left here, not logical, rational people.
 
Surely, being illegal immigrants, each and every one of them has committed a crime already so the figure of crimes committed by illegal immigrants is already at 100%?

Obviously! But everyone knows that it means crimes committed whilst residing in the USA, rather than the crime of entering the USA.
 
I typed "Replacement of the British population by Tony Blair". How is that leading the witness?
It's implying that it did happen. Changing the intent of the sentence from a question to a request for a summary of a known event.

That will make the LLM reply with an answer that agrees with the question. Even if you just add a 'was there a' at the beginning it changes the response perceptibly.
 
Surely, being illegal immigrants, each and every one of them has committed a crime already so the figure of crimes committed by illegal immigrants is already at 100%?
Illegal immigrant isn't a technical term as it's more complicated than that.

And plenty of undocumented people on the US haven't committed any crimes.
 
It was an execution. Stone cold. They pepper spray him. Five ICE agents hold him down. One draws his gun and shoots him dead. Utterly sickening. You can see it all in this video:

Not being funny but I am not seeing anything shocking here? These people are playing games and the ICE agents are not. This man was fighting and resisting, I really do not understand how anyone could be so shocked. Shooting someone dead is not nice to see but they have a job to do and if you get in their way then this is how they react. Just leave them alone and nobody gets hurt.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top