ICE told to get the eff out

[carmanmemoranda]

I recall when that bloke from Liverpool drove through all of those people how everyone was saying it was a driving mistake and he didn't do it on purpose. That didn't go down too well in court.

different situation don't you think

 

[Highway Man]

You lap up the trump lies.

Carry on

Why are you bringing Trump into this, he wasn't involved in it

 

[Highway Man]

different situation don't you think

No I don't, she drove at. an ICE agent and was repeatedly told to stop

 

[MNW67]

Look again - he was hit and pushed to the side by the car

No, in this photo he was standing to the left of the car and her wheels are already turned to the right. She then sets off to the right. For some reason he jumps backwards. She didn't hit him and was never going to hit him.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

No I don't, she drove at. an ICE agent

Incorrect

and was repeatedly told to stop

Correct

So on balance not true.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Why are you bringing Trump into this, he wasn't involved in it

A quote...


But the Trump administration has called her a "domestic terrorist".

 

[Vinty]

With this bit Trump and his apologists, but as usual, the fat **** you have just proved hiways point

Not really, instead of telling the truth about the incident, Trumps claims the woman was a terrorist and his mouthpieces claim she tried to kill ICE agents.
I think she probably panicked and feared for her own safety.

 

[Highway Man]

Incorrect

Correct

So on balance not true.

You are blinded by Trump. Look at the facts and weigh up her actions. She made a bad choice

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You are blinded by Trump. Look at the facts and weigh up her actions. She made a bad choice

It's not me that's avoiding the facts !

 

[aveatry]

different situation don't you think

Yes because she was stopped before she could carry on

 

[aveatry]

No, in this photo he was standing to the left of the car and her wheels are already turned to the right. She then sets off to the right. For some reason he jumps backwards. She didn't hit him and was never going to hit him.

View attachment 403994

You need to look at the footage from the front - he was clearly hit - he bounced off the car - your "shot one" was after he bounced off the wing of the car

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Yes because she was stopped before she could carry on

You think she was about to drive into people?

Anything to back this up with?

If none, then it's fair to assume every motorist should be shot before they do it.

 

[noseall]

An act of terrorism is the wording and is pretty much what it is by using your vehicle as a weapon?

As opposed to a terrorist using his knee or his 9mm Glock, you mean?

Lawyers are going to tear him a new one.

 

[aveatry]

You think she was about to drive into people?

Did you know she wasn’t
The cop who shot her was hit by her - as far as he was concerned she had already hit one person - him

 

[MNW67]

You need to look at the footage from the front - he was clearly hit - he bounced off the car - your "shot one" was after he bounced off the wing of the car

The video from the front is very deceptive and you can't see what really happened. NY Times have synced the two videos. It shows shot one is fired, then he jumps backwards and fires the other two shots. At no point was he hit by the car. What looks like him being hit from the front is actually him jumping backwards.