- Joined
- 10 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 1,213
- Reaction score
- 986
- Country

Which video. The same one with this still. Or another one.
The video analysis in the PJW video, which you dismissed, shows different. Better ignore it.

Which video. The same one with this still. Or another one.
Yes-is there a vid from the still as its just trees and dark figures, a vid may make it clearerWhich video. The same one with this still. Or another one.
Yes-is there a vid from the still as its just trees and dark figures, a vid may make it clearer

The video analysis in the PJW video, which you dismissed, shows different. Better ignore it.
It was set up, you don’t stand in front of car that’s driving off, with gun in hand unless you intend to kill first ask questions later. Especially when the other guy is distracting them. Nor can you assume a couple of white women are lethal threats. It was the exercise of authority from the barrel of a gun.It's clear she knew who they were, her intention was to impede them. - there is no credible argument she was fleeing masked gun men.
It's clear her passenger "wife" made some minor threats.
what might be unclear to those claiming illegal force is the person who did the shooting, was not the guy with his hand in the window, but the guy in front of the vehicle with "Police" clearly showing on his uniform.
the shots were over a period of 1 second.
I can't see any credible argument that there was a pause between shots 1,2 and 3.
I would say he was close enough to the front of the vehicle to be at a reasonable risk she was clearly being told to stop and ignored the instructions.
By "their" test, I reckon it's close, but not close enough.
Yes-is there a vid from the still as its just trees and dark figures, a vid may make it clearer

A pretty dramatic set up where everyone knew where to position themselves and even knew what her move would be whilst telling her to get out of the car.It was set up, you don’t stand in front of car that’s driving off, with gun in hand unless you intend to kill first ask questions later. Especially when the other guy is distracting them. Nor can you assume a couple of white women are lethal threats. It was the exercise of authority from the barrel of a gun.
Nobody has claimed what you say.A pretty dramatic set up where everyone knew where to position themselves and even knew what her move would be whilst telling her to get out of the car.
Conspiracy nut job spreading misinformation - for what purposeIt was set up, you don’t stand in front of car that’s driving off, with gun in hand unless you intend to kill first ask questions later. Especially when the other guy is distracting them. Nor can you assume a couple of white women are lethal threats. It was the exercise of authority from the barrel of a gun.
What's this thenNobody has claimed what you say.
It was set up, you don’t stand in front of car that’s driving off, with gun in hand unless you intend to kill first ask questions later. Especially when the other guy is distracting them. Nor can you assume a couple of white women are lethal threats. It was the exercise of authority from the barrel of a gun.

Along with,The motto of the police state.

Yes they do, keep up John.Nobody has claimed what you say.

Plus the local authorities who have been frozen out of the investigation. Any idea why that may be ?The ones stating that this was cold blooded murder are simply ignoring the facts, the law and are blind and over excited at the fact that this lady brought it on herself, there is plenty of video evidence showing this and take note that the ones who are trying to say it was illegal are all the usual Trump haters and all defenders of illegal immigrants. Biased opinions where as us who say that this was a lawful killing are completely unbiased towards our opinion.