That makes no sense whatsoever. Do you think if you keep saying something it becomes true? Deluded7Mottie admits he is wrong

That makes no sense whatsoever. Do you think if you keep saying something it becomes true? Deluded7Mottie admits he is wrong

Give some to me?Gulp. That’s what I plan to do! Mrs Mottie retired a few weeks ago and doesn’t get her NHS or state pension for a few more years. Apart from our savings that are in ISA's, we have other savings, plus the money from the sale of our business premises and in the new year I will have another sizeable chunk when we we sell my mums house. My state pension alone takes me over the threshold and I have to sit down and do some calculations yet but plan to put a fair chunk of it in her name in an interest paying account and use her tax free allowance to avoid paying tax on the interest which should save us a fair bit. Any better suggestions?
I think you've been married long enough not to have any real concerns
Plus it was HER mum's money anyway , not yours directly

What you on about. You are not making any sense (nothing unusual there). No need to try to prove anything is there? You lied. You got caught.Poor Highway Mam
You got angry and started this to try and have a go at me…..if it makes you feel better, It’s ever so upsetting seeing the muppets trying to prove something they can’t![]()
It clearly says £50k per person. So Notch’s household could have above £50k in premium bonds, no problem.

Im not fussed, I haven't got any premium bonds, if notch said he personally had more than 50ks worth he couldn't have.It clearly says £50k per person. So Notch’s household could have above £50k in premium bonds, no problem.
So why the fuss?
Notch implied that he had £50k’s worth and he was going to buy "another" £50K's worth. Can’t you read?It clearly says £50k per person. So Notch’s household could have above £50k in premium bonds, no problem.
So why the fuss?
Of course he could. He just puts another £50k in his missus name.Im not fussed, I haven't got any premium bonds, if notch said he personally had more than 50ks worth he couldn't have.
Honestly I dont care
We’re exactly the same.I look after the finances for me and wife. We both have separate accounts at various places. It's all our money regardless of who's name it's in

He as in him personally in his name? No he couldn'tOf course he could. He just puts another £50k in his missus name.

In the event that you and Mrs Mottie ever part ways, assets acquired via inheritance can be ring fenced. Almost everything else is matrimonial. If you transfer in the inheritance you lose its status.Gulp. That’s what I plan to do! Mrs Mottie retired a few weeks ago and doesn’t get her NHS or state pension for a few more years. Apart from our savings that are in ISA's, we have other savings, plus the money from the sale of our business premises and in the new year I will have another sizeable chunk when we we sell my mums house. My state pension alone takes me over the threshold and I have to sit down and do some calculations yet but plan to put a fair chunk of it in her name in an interest paying account and use her tax free allowance to avoid paying tax on the interest which should save us a fair bit. Any better suggestions?
In another thread, he said she already had £50k's worth. Have you taken on the role of Notch's defender all of a sudden?Of course he could. He just puts another £50k in his missus name.
Easily done with your missus’s allowance going unused.Notch implied that he had £50k’s worth and he was going to buy "another" £50K's worth.
I can add and subtract too. £50k + £50k = £100k.Can’t you read?

That's just addingI can add and subtract too. £50k + £50k = £100k.

Do you refer to yourself as I when you mean your wife or other household adult.Can his wife not have had PBs ?