Kasper Eriksen, arrested, shackled, thrown in prison by Trumps gestapo.

Mottie said:
You’re just not getting it, are you? I guess I’ll have just keep repeating it to you as if you were a backward child and hope that one day it clicks.



Feel free to click the link and read them for yourself, I’m not going to waste my time typing out something you could get an adult to read to you.
Click to expand...
he's busy warming up a large slice of humble pie to Munch on.
 
motorbiking said:
U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country
Click to expand...
Those are NOT visa overstayers.

and you’ve moved the goalpost.

You said
motorbiking said:
on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country
Click to expand...
Article 3 of ECHR is in a situation where they may die if they are not able to get the medical treatment they need, or their quality of life would be so poor it would breach their human rights.

So far different from “no,access to NHS in their home country.

And not visa overstayers.




You’ve been caught out again, I’m too sharp for devious little tricks.
 
motorbiking said:
he's busy warming up a large slice of humble pie to Munch on.
Click to expand...
I’ve just destroyed your dishonest little argument.

You claimed visa overstayers get to stay “because there’s no,NHS in their country” - rancid BS

I’ve just driven a coach and horse through your BS :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Notch7 said:
Those are NOT visa overstayers.

and you’ve moved the goalpost.

You said

Article 3 of ECHR is in a situation where they may die if they are not able to get the medical treatment they need, or their quality of life would be so poor it would breach their human rights.

So far different from “no,access to NHS in their home country.

And not visa overstayers.




You’ve been caught out again, I’m too sharp for devious little tricks.
Click to expand...
Notch7 said:
I’ve just destroyed your dishonest little argument.

You claimed visa overstayers get to stay “because there’s no,NHS in their country” - rancid BS

I’ve just driven a coach and horse through your BS :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Ahh here we go "I am the self declared winner, based on NotchyFacts™"

Again you demonstrate zero knowledge.

You could just apologise and say:

"I didn't look, I pretended I had, but I didn't know where to look. I can't be bothered to look through the 1000s of cases where every single claimants lawyer focused heavily on medical issues that are difficult to diagnose, prove and treat, because they know there is a winning meal ticket."

You've been provided with the case law, the policy and a link to search.

What a shame you can't debate things sensibly. What a shame you make dishonest allegations. what a shame you pretend to have knowledge when you don't.
 
Notch7 said:
He is applying for citizenship, he is not a visa overstayer

He has worked in the USA for over 10 years, lives a fully law abiding life…..supporting the American economy doing a blue collar job.
Failing to comply with a deadline on one item of paperwork doesn’t make him a person of bad intent.

Not once have you provided any evidence that supports him being detained, handcuffed, shackled, thrown in jail.


You are a thoroughly unpleasant nasty person who supports Trump because he is a vindictive bully.
Click to expand...
Now lets think how do you initially get into the US to work oh yeah a visa and he obviously has not kept up with the terms of how he should proceed otherwise he would not be getting thrown out .
And countless visa over stayers live law abiding lives and contribute to the economy but it doesnt make them legal unlike the people who have done everything by the book as they should do
 
Notch7 said:
Article 3 of ECHR is in a situation where they may die if they are not able to get the medical treatment they need, or their quality of life would be so poor it would breach their human rights.

So far different from “no,access to NHS in their home country.

And not visa overstayers.




You’ve been caught out again, I’m too sharp for devious little tricks.
Click to expand...
Incorrect.

in medical claims a claimant may claim that their return would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, in light of the disparity between medical treatment being received in the UK and that available in the country of proposed return
Click to expand...
thats pretty clear.

Notchy is depressed because he's being sent home, Notch's lawyer says he has mental health problems, he doesn't have a right to remain, because his claim has been rejected or he has overstayed his visa. His home country has no state medical care for his mental health problems. Notchy is poor - Notchy's lawyers knows he will win on appeal.

Human rights law is one of the fasted growing meal ticket in the UK..
 
Notch7 said:
Motorbiking is still angry because his grifting lies about pushbacks got destroyed
Click to expand...
Has there been a new law making it illegal? I missed that. Please provide a link.

Or are you talking Boll@x?
 
It amazes me how we in the U.K. grant humanitarian leave to remain for overstayers on the basis that there is no NHS in their home country
Click to expand...
in medical claims a claimant may claim that their return would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, in light of the disparity between medical treatment being received in the UK and that available in the country of proposed return
Click to expand...

Facts not NotchyFacts™
 
motorbiking said:
What a shame you can't debate things sensibly
Click to expand...
Please take your advice.

You claimed that visa overstayers were allowed to stay because “there’s no NHS in their country”

And you posted a ton of links, none of which support your claim.


If you want a sensible debate, this is how you do it:

1) you make a claim, such as: “visa overstayers allowed to stay because there’s no,NHS in their country

2) you provide a link that specifically shows
a) relates specifically to visa overstayers
b) relates specifically people allowed to stay because of no NHS in their country.
 
motorbiking said:
Facts not NotchyFacts™
Click to expand...
You’ve posted some facts, just not facts that support your claim.

Nowhere does it mention “visa overstayers”
Nowhere does it mention they are allowed to stay because “there is no NHS in their home country”

No go away and either find actual evidence that directly or supports your claim that “visa overstayers are allowed to stay cos no NHS in home country” OR admit you made a claim that isn’t true.

Off you go.
 
Notch7 said:
You’ve posted some facts, just not facts that support your claim.

Nowhere does it mention “visa overstayers”
Nowhere does it mention they are allowed to stay because “there is no NHS in their home country”

No go away and either find actual evidence that directly or supports your claim that “visa overstayers are allowed to stay cos no NHS in home country” OR admit you made a claim that isn’t true.

Off you go.
Click to expand...
Notchy doesn't understand the process for a visa over stayer to claim a right to remain.
Notchy doesn't understand that a mental illness and disparity of affordable care is sufficient.

Notchy doesn't believe that the UK grant leave to remain to people with Medical issues, because there is no NHS in their home country.


This guidance tells you how to consider applications for leave to remain on medical grounds where a claimant claims that removing them from the UK would breach their human rights.
Click to expand...
A claimant may claim that requiring them to leave the UK would breach their human rights due to a serious medical condition, which could be a physical illness or mental health issue. Such cases must be considered in accordance with our obligations under Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR.
Click to expand...
Article 3: provides protection against torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment – in medical claims a claimant may claim that their return would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment, in light of the disparity between medical treatment being received in the UK and that available in the country of proposed return (Article 3 is an absolute, unqualified right)
Click to expand...
Section 3(1) of the Immigration Act 1971 provides the power to grant leave to enter or remain in the UK and Section 3(1)(c) provides powers to impose conditions on that leave.
Click to expand...
The claimant seeks:
leave outside the rules (LOTR) or Discretionary Leave (DL) on medical grounds, or to receive medical treatment on the NHS

• the claimant expresses fear of return, is unwilling to return, or wants to remain in the UK because medical facilities in their home country are not: available, affordable, accessible of the same standard as treatment in the UK
Click to expand...
So thats you tucked up nicely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top