Lucy Connolly to be freed

[pete01]

Bet she wouldn't have been locked up if she was American

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Bet she wouldn't have been locked up if she was American

They made a political example out of her.

The naughty police are now interviewing anyone who posts comments outside the narrative.

 

[SPLINE]

Lucy Connolly is the ultimate victim of Britain's two-tier justice system. She was jailed for being tier two (against the regime) whereas the tier-one (regime-supporting) Ricky Jones got off scot-free. She is a political prisoner of an extremely evil government, akin to Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet era. Arguments over the legal processes (the plea, the advice, the remand) are irrelevant; if you zoom out it is clear that she is morally in the right. Lucy Connolly has a massive case against Starmer's government, but sadly there is no way in this hellish system that she could ever bring it.

 

[denso13]

Lucy Connolly is the ultimate victim of Britain's two-tier justice system. She was jailed for being tier two (against the regime) whereas the tier-one (regime-supporting) Ricky Jones got off scot-free. She is a political prisoner of an extremely evil government, akin to Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet era. Arguments over the legal processes (the plea, the advice, the remand) are irrelevant; if you zoom out it is clear that she is morally in the right. Lucy Connolly has a massive case against Starmer's government, but sadly there is no way in this hellish system that she could ever bring it.

Bigoted nonsense. You'll fit in well with the gammons on here.

 

[MNW67]

Lucy Connolly is the ultimate victim of Britain's two-tier justice system. She was jailed for being tier two (against the regime) whereas the tier-one (regime-supporting) Ricky Jones got off scot-free. She is a political prisoner of an extremely evil government, akin to Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet era. Arguments over the legal processes (the plea, the advice, the remand) are irrelevant; if you zoom out it is clear that she is morally in the right. Lucy Connolly has a massive case against Starmer's government, but sadly there is no way in this hellish system that she could ever bring it.

I wonder what would have happened if she had taken her chances with a jury like Ricky Jones did.

 

[Munroast]

I wonder what would have happened if she had taken her chances with a jury like Ricky Jones did.

I would suspect 15 reasonable members of the public would have concluded she was no direct threat to anyone, what she wrote was clearly wrong but treating her as some dangerous terrorist was way OTT

the jury were right with Ricky Jones, what he said should be water off a ducks back to any reasonable person, the only difference between Lucy and Ricky was they were on opposing sides of starmers far left fence

we need to protect free speech even when it does not suit our own views

 

[denso13]

I would suspect 15 reasonable members of the public would have concluded she was no direct threat to anyone, what she wrote was clearly wrong but treating her as some dangerous terrorist was way OTT

the jury were right with Ricky Jones, what he said should be water off a ducks back to any reasonable person, the only difference between Lucy and Ricky was they were on opposing sides of starmers far left fence

we need to protect free speech even when it does not suit our own views

Free speech doesn't mean you can break the law, especially in the midst of widespread riots.

 

[MNW67]

the jury were right with Ricky Jones, what he said should be water off a ducks back to any reasonable person, the only difference between Lucy and Ricky was they were on opposing sides of starmers far left fence

we need to protect free speech even when it does not suit our own views

That doesn't make sense. Both were prosecuted.

 

[Munroast]

That doesn't make sense. Both were prosecuted.

one went in front of a jury, the other took bad advice and was crucified by some magistrate or judge following orders and advice to amke an example. that was not good and fair justice,

 

[denso13]

that was not good and fair justice,

Confirmed as fair by the Court of Appeal. But if you think they are all corrupt then who knows.

 

[blup]

Lucy Connolly is the ultimate victim of Britain's two-tier justice system. She was jailed for being tier two (against the regime) whereas the tier-one (regime-supporting) Ricky Jones got off scot-free. She is a political prisoner of an extremely evil government, akin to Solzhenitsyn in the Soviet era. Arguments over the legal processes (the plea, the advice, the remand) are irrelevant; if you zoom out it is clear that she is morally in the right. Lucy Connolly has a massive case against Starmer's government, but sadly there is no way in this hellish system that she could ever bring it.

Like him and plenty of others tweeting hate?

Councillor suspended over bad taste Corbyn tweet explains himself

He deeply regrets the post

www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk

 

[ajrtd]

It seems to me that Lucy Connolly was jailed because she received bad legal advice. Ricky Jones on the other hand was acquitted because he received good legal advice.

 

[aveatry]

There must of been 100s if not 1,000s of similar or even worse tweets - did they all go to prison or was it just a woman who was married to a conservative councillor.

 

[Notch7]

we need to protect free speech even when it does not suit our own views

So you would support a Muslim posting comments calling for white people to be bombed?

 

[Notch7]

It seems to me that Lucy Connolly was jailed because she received bad legal advice. Ricky Jones on the other hand was acquitted because he received good legal advice.

She should’ve pleaded not guilty, I think she would’ve been acquitted.