Lucy Connolly to be freed

It’s why people are told they do not have the right not go be offended
too many "not"s?

In law and charging its clear that its the perception of others that matters not the person giving the insult/hate speech.
 
The entity called 'MWN67" likens the 2011 riots to the 2024 protests. Very wrong... the two are at opposite ends of the moral universe. The 2011 riots were an outbreak of looting and shoplifting by immigrants in response to the lawful killing by the police of a violent criminal immigrant. The 2024 protests (aka "the Starmer riots") were a desperate reaction by native people to a series of government-enabled attacks by immigrants on British people. First there was Harehills, then the Kent barracks stabbing, the Manchester Airport police attack and finally the Southport murders. At that point in time, it seemed liked there was an uprising by the immigrants with the government doing nothing about it. Voting had not worked.

MNW67 = Himmy
The 2024 riots were Farage Riots.
 
too many "not"s?

In law and charging its clear that its the perception of others that matters not the person giving the insult/hate speech.
Its the argument that people have the right to offend, therefore he targets of the offensive comment do not have the right not to be offended. For example jokes against a particular group.
 
Its not the point being brought to attention.

1) should have gone not guilty (y)
There's no should about it. She received advice from the duty solicitor, and when the police didn't accept her explanation, she clearly wanted to sort it there and then and minimise the sentence by pleading guilty to an offence she had clearly committed. Lawyers often disagree and her brief at the court of appeal took a different tack in the light of the plea. It's a good example of how pressurised the prosecution process is for the defendant, but that holds good for everyone whose been through it.
2) no room for political interference(y)


both allegations are clear in his tweet. He's a KC, he's going to be careful how he writes it.
The only political interference is Re form and others jumping on the bandwagon, and making her a political martyr. Doubtless they will campaign on a pardon for her, or the right for the PM to pardon generally. Just go back to what she said and who she (wrongly) targeted) and the atmosphere in the country at the time.
 
coconut is similar to gammon. It's an insult based on skin colour

Not similar at all. Coconut is about accusing a black person of trying to ingratiate themselves with white people. It is specifically about race. Gammon is about accusing a middle aged right winger of getting worked up about issues such as trans rights, immigration, people on benefits, gay marriage etc. etc.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top