
Except they don't, do they? An employer pages wages and other employment provisions.Even the self-employed have an employer![]()
Except they don't, do they? An employer pages wages and other employment provisions.

Even the self-employed have an employer![]()
...to the self-employed person
Ergo, the self-employed person is their employee (for the time of them being engaged by the employer).
No, they are not, as I explained. A freelancer is not employed by a company and is not paid a wage by that company....to the self-employed person
Ergo, the self-employed person is their employee (for the time of them being engaged by the employer).

Never heard of shared NI numbers etc ?Employers are fully aware of any illegals working for them. It is impossible for an employer to unwitting employ an illegal. They need to use specialised ID check providers or get confirmation from the Home Office based on information presented.
So the digital ID will do literally nothing to improve this situation.

Better Id checks to remove possibilities of shared information across employeesthere are 3 categories:
Employed
Sameworker
Much easier for authorities to check such as car washes, turkish barbers etc that many are complaining about,Self employed
And should be easily traceable by the authoritiesA self employed person is a service provider, there are no legal checks required to determine that, for example the bloke who fits your carpets is entitled to work in the UK. He provides you with a service.
So what's the issue?An employer is already required to check employees and workers.
The issue is that it is totally different to voluntarily share information with companies/departments which are not cross linked...So what's the issue?
An intrusion of our liberties? No more than the myriad of other information we gladly share, without even realising.
well they may beNo, they are not, as I explained. A freelancer is not employed by a company and is not paid a wage by that company.

Let me list a few. Phone, number plates, debit cards, credit cards, passport, taxes, NI, nhs, banks etc etc.The issue is that it is totally different to voluntarily share information with companies/departments which are not cross linked...
What is proposed is an all encompassing database and all the automatic cross referencing that enables...
If you believe that you gladly share information without realising it already
Right or wrong, I'm on the fence., then you obviously don't understand the implications of what is proposed in this latest attempt to catalogue the population to a far greater extent than was envisaged only 15 years ago when it was dropped...
Because technology moves on exponentially!
there are 3 categories:
Employed
worker
Self employed
A self employed person is a service provider, there are no legal checks required to determine that, for example the bloke who fits your carpets is entitled to work in the UK. He provides you with a service.
An employer is already required to check employees and workers.
he will do a tax returnA self employed person is a service provider, there are no legal checks required to determine that, for example the bloke who fits your carpets is entitled to work in the UK. He provides you with a service.
I believe the passport and drivers licence systems are interconnected. Which means we have a system to start it with.It’s interesting how the right (at least on this forum) are split. Starmy’s instinct to link ID to immigration seems to be paying dividends. I can’t see digital ID working across different government departments until everything is joined up below. I have a number of different passwords for different parts of the NHS as well as the GP surgeries. All have different IT systems. Many of the logins fail to work after s specified period if you have not logged in (why)?. The project involves a huge investment, the government will be milked by open ended contracts, and there is no way it can be delivered by 2029. Its reminiscent of the attempts to digitise NHS records, maybe it’s Kieth’s HS2.